sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Arwed von Merkatz <v.merkatz AT gmx.net>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: [SM-Discuss] split gcc spells
- Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 16:58:32 +0200
Hi,
could anyone enlighten me what we win with the split gcc spells compared
to a single one? The user still has to choose the right compilers when
casting the gcc spell, so nothing has changed there.
As far as I can see all we get is a lot more maintenance for no real
benefit, am I wrong there?
--
Arwed v. Merkatz Source Mage GNU/Linux developer
http://www.sourcemage.org
-
[SM-Discuss] split gcc spells,
Arwed von Merkatz, 06/30/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] split gcc spells,
Paul, 06/30/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] split gcc spells, Arwed von Merkatz, 06/30/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] split gcc spells,
Eric Sandall, 06/30/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] split gcc spells,
Arwed von Merkatz, 06/30/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] split gcc spells, Eric Sandall, 06/30/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] split gcc spells,
Arwed von Merkatz, 06/30/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] split gcc spells, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 06/30/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] split gcc spells,
Paul, 06/30/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.