sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Seth Alan Woolley <seth AT positivism.org>
- To: "Sergey A. Lipnevich" <sergey AT optimaltec.com>
- Cc: Arwed von Merkatz <v.merkatz AT gmx.net>, Source Mage - Discuss <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] spells that fail with gcc 3.4.0
- Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2004 12:06:10 -0700
IANAL, but from my reading of the license...
We have permission to distribute it to anybody who accepts the SCSL
license, so click-wrap confirm in the spell would work.
Seth
On Sun, Jun 20, 2004 at 10:54:52AM -0400, Sergey A. Lipnevich wrote:
> Well, people who wanted to build from source had this problem for quite
> some time and understood the reason. Now that Sun's talking of
> open-sourcing Java maybe we'll have a better luck.
>
> Arwed von Merkatz wrote:
>
> >On Sun, Jun 20, 2004 at 10:43:47AM -0400, Sergey A. Lipnevich wrote:
> >
> >
> >>I have patches for imlib2, cdparanoia, gnome-terminal (not really a GCC
> >>3.4 problem).
> >>In regards to all Java spells, Blackdown's Java SDK uses libstdc++.so.5
> >>and GCC 3.4.0 has so.6. I used Sun's SDK 1.4.2_04 (have a patch and
> >>waiting to submit) that doesn't depends on libstdc++ at all and ant,
> >>antlr are OK now. Also, gst-plugins, evolution-data-server, libmng,
> >>gnome-media2 build OK in devel grimoire for me.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >Same here about the j2sdk, got a spell for Sun's too, but the problem is
> >that there's no direct download link for that, so people have to
> >download it by hand and put it in /var/spool/sorcery. (And sun's great
> >license doesn't allow us to mirror it to make it direct downloadable by
> >the spell ...)
> >
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Discuss mailing list
> SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
>
--
Seth Alan Woolley [seth at positivism.org], SPAM/UCE is unauthorized
Key id EF10E21A = 36AD 8A92 8499 8439 E6A8 3724 D437 AF5D EF10 E21A
http://smgl.positivism.org:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xEF10E21A
Security Team Leader Source Mage GNU/Linux http://www.sourcemage.org
Attachment:
pgpDlcLVP6N8H.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-
[SM-Discuss] spells that fail with gcc 3.4.0,
Robin Cook, 06/13/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] spells that fail with gcc 3.4.0,
Arwed von Merkatz, 06/13/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] spells that fail with gcc 3.4.0,
Robin Cook, 06/13/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] spells that fail with gcc 3.4.0, Robin Cook, 06/13/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] spells that fail with gcc 3.4.0,
Robin Cook, 06/13/2004
-
[SM-Discuss] Re: spells that fail with gcc 3.4.0,
Treeve Jelbert, 06/19/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Re: spells that fail with gcc 3.4.0, Paul, 06/19/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] spells that fail with gcc 3.4.0,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 06/20/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] spells that fail with gcc 3.4.0,
Arwed von Merkatz, 06/20/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] spells that fail with gcc 3.4.0,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 06/20/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] spells that fail with gcc 3.4.0,
Seth Alan Woolley, 06/20/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] spells that fail with gcc 3.4.0, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 06/20/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] spells that fail with gcc 3.4.0,
Seth Alan Woolley, 06/20/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] spells that fail with gcc 3.4.0,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 06/20/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] spells that fail with gcc 3.4.0,
Arwed von Merkatz, 06/20/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] spells that fail with gcc 3.4.0,
Arwed von Merkatz, 06/13/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.