sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
Re: [SM-Discuss] prelink for ppc (especially) and x86 testers?
- From: Paul <dufflebunk AT dufflebunk.homeip.net>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] prelink for ppc (especially) and x86 testers?
- Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2004 19:01:34 -0400
I'm pretty sure that I didn't understand anything of what you said. But
that's ok, you know what you're talking about, I don't, so I'll trust
you when you say either "there's no point" or "it can't be done". I'm
not sure which you said, but I think it's one of the two.
On Wed, 2004-09-06 at 15:34 -0700, Seth Alan Woolley wrote:
> Considering that the whole point of prelinking is to optimize the link
> location and avoid collisions among a large set of dynamic link
> scenarios, it only makes sense when run on an entire link-tree branch
> from the trunk to the leaves. There is no way that I know of to tell
> prelink to avoid prelinking (modifying) glibc, for example, while
> allowing it to prelink all the rest of the system, since the if it
> linked glibc first in a large link area that had been prelink-associated
> to everything else, the linker would have to fall back to normal linking
> for everything prelinked to it. non-ld Run-time linking wouldn't cause
> that problem, but init-time linking using ld would.
>
> On Wed, Jun 09, 2004 at 05:40:22PM -0400, Paul wrote:
> > Is it necessary to prelink all binaries, or is it possible to have not
> > prelink important things like stuff from basesystem? At least while it's
> > still in testing.
> >
> > On Wed, 2004-09-06 at 14:08 -0700, Seth Alan Woolley wrote:
> > > Anybody want to try prelink for ppc for me? test and devel grimoires.
> > > Probably will royally mess up your binaries -- no joke, full backup
> > > first.
> > >
> > > I believe x86 prelink is working up to snuff, testers for the 20040520
> > > version of prelink for x86 should have less risk, backups highly
> > > suggested as well.
> > >
> > > Just cast the spell and read the manuals and try doing it. It will mess
> > > up the sorcery-tracked md5s on your binaries. I'm writing a tool to
> > > work around that called "alter".
> > >
> > > Seth
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > SM-Discuss mailing list
> > > SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> > > http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
>
>
>
> > _______________________________________________
> > SM-Discuss mailing list
> > SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> > http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Discuss mailing list
> SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-
[SM-Discuss] prelink for ppc (especially) and x86 testers?,
Seth Alan Woolley, 06/09/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] prelink for ppc (especially) and x86 testers?,
Paul, 06/09/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] prelink for ppc (especially) and x86 testers?,
Seth Alan Woolley, 06/09/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] prelink for ppc (especially) and x86 testers?, Paul, 06/09/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] prelink for ppc (especially) and x86 testers?,
Seth Alan Woolley, 06/09/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] prelink for ppc (especially) and x86 testers?,
Paul, 06/09/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.