Public SourceMage Discussion List

[Arwed von Merkatz <v.merkatz AT gmx.net>]

On Wed, Jun 09, 2004 at 04:11:14PM +0200, Treeve Jelbert wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> On Tuesday 01 June 2004 18:02, Arjan Bouter wrote:
> > On Tue, 1 Jun 2004 03:12:31 +0200
> >
> > Mads Laursen <dossen+sgl AT daimi.au.dk> wrote:
> > > On 31/05/04 14.01, Treeve Jelbert wrote:
> > > > after something of a break, and a major struggle with gcc-java, I have
> > > > working copies of the following spells in my local grimoire
> > > > Apart from gcc and gcc-java, the disk space needed is now quire small
> > > >
> > > > $ grep gcc /var/state/sorcery/packages
> > > > gcc:20040530:installed:3.4.0
> > > > gcc-g77:20040530:installed:3.4.0
> > > > gcc-g++:20040530:installed:3.4.0
> > > > gcc-java:20040531:installed:3.4.0
> > >
> > > Cool.
> > >
> > > > gcc             creates the various compilers
> > >
> > > What happens when you use a compiler without having the libs? Can
> > > something be done about that? Maybe have the actual compilers
> > > somewhere else and then link them in, when we get the libs?
> > >
> > > > gcc-g++ C++ library
> > > > gcc-g77 fortran library
> > > > gcc-java        requires about 430MB to build! I shall try to add
> > > > --disable-static
> > >
> > > Damn. That much.
> >
> > Yeah, exactly the reason I couldn't test the gcc patch...
> >
> gcc-g++ now libstdc++
> gcc-g77 now libg2c
> libgcj now builds in ONLY 326MB, peak utilisation
> gcc-objc now an optional part of the gcc spell 
> 
> 
> does anyone actually have an urgent need for the Ada compiler and library?
> If not, I can put the  spells  that I have into the devel grimoire

Not an urgent need, but we currently provide it so we can't remove it
from test/stable grimoires, but for devel it's ok. When I get a chance
to look at your split spells I'll take a try at getting ada working.

> 
> > :-(
> > :
> > > > gcc-objc        won't configure for me
> > > > gcc-ada         not yet started
> > > >
> > > > since these spells only install libraries, I was considering renaming
> > > > them
> > > >
> > > > gcc-g++ => libstc++
> > > > gcc-java => libjava
> > >
> > > isn't 'libgcj' the "official" name?
> > >
> > > > gcc-g77  => libg2c
> > >
> > > Anyways, sounds really nice.
> > >
> > > /dossen
> Regards,  Treeve 
> 
> - -- 
> PGP Key ID: AB929B24
> PGP Key Fingerprint:31D9 D22F 42E6 F545 662E  AB6F 9697 34C5 AB92 9B24 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
> 
> iD8DBQFAxxqJlpc0xauSmyQRAvepAKDlZqhJY7PHHZDyLTDe7cj+QupbXACfazLx
> b3ZxfG/Jim9JUqu7fmqfIws=
> =YS8f
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Discuss mailing list
> SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
> 

-- 
Arwed v. Merkatz                              Source Mage GNU/Linux developer
                                                    http://www.sourcemage.org