Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - Re: [SM-Discuss] gcc split -progress update

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Arjan Bouter <a_bouter AT ezrs.com>
  • To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] gcc split -progress update
  • Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2004 18:02:09 +0200

On Tue, 1 Jun 2004 03:12:31 +0200
Mads Laursen <dossen+sgl AT daimi.au.dk> wrote:

> On 31/05/04 14.01, Treeve Jelbert wrote:
> > after something of a break, and a major struggle with gcc-java, I have
> > working copies of the following spells in my local grimoire
> > Apart from gcc and gcc-java, the disk space needed is now quire small
> >
> > $ grep gcc /var/state/sorcery/packages
> > gcc:20040530:installed:3.4.0
> > gcc-g77:20040530:installed:3.4.0
> > gcc-g++:20040530:installed:3.4.0
> > gcc-java:20040531:installed:3.4.0
>
> Cool.
>
> > gcc creates the various compilers
>
> What happens when you use a compiler without having the libs? Can
> something be done about that? Maybe have the actual compilers
> somewhere else and then link them in, when we get the libs?
>
> > gcc-g++ C++ library
> > gcc-g77 fortran library
> > gcc-java requires about 430MB to build! I shall try to add
> > --disable-static
>
> Damn. That much.

Yeah, exactly the reason I couldn't test the gcc patch...
:-(

>
> > gcc-objc won't configure for me
> > gcc-ada not yet started
> >
> > since these spells only install libraries, I was considering renaming
> > them
> >
> > gcc-g++ => libstc++
> > gcc-java => libjava
>
> isn't 'libgcj' the "official" name?
>
> > gcc-g77 => libg2c
>
> Anyways, sounds really nice.
>
> /dossen
>
>


--
+=======
Proud Source Mage GNU/Linux user,
Linux so advanced, it may as well be magic.
http://www.sourcemage.org

Registered as user #310617 with the Linux Counter,
http://counter.li.org.
+===

Attachment: pgpw4m1OEUhYw.pgp
Description: PGP signature




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page