sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
Re: [SM-Discuss] chrootizing spells into a chroot for secure web serving with thttpd
- From: Andrew <afrayedknot AT thefrayedknot.armory.com>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] chrootizing spells into a chroot for secure web serving with thttpd
- Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 00:17:18 -0700
Does this stuff have anything to do with the work left over from bug
bug 3199?
http://bugs.sourcemage.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3199
On Thu, May 13, 2004 at 12:29:50AM -0700, Seth Alan Woolley wrote:
> On Thu, May 13, 2004 at 08:39:29AM +0200, Vladim?r Marek wrote:
> > > > Since there seems to be a long silence, I thought I'd break it with my
> > > > latest project. Since I lost my previous chroot environment in a
> > > > harddrive crash, I thought I'd try to do it in an automated way this
> > > > time.
> >
> > Great news, possibility to run certain serveces in chroot would be
> > really great.
>
> We try to have all services do this by default, and if not, at least use
> privilege separation as much as possible. thttpd, ntpd, bind, vsftpd,
> sshd, all follow this philosophy. Right now, all services running on my
> personal server except apache for a couple php websites are secured in this
> manner.
>
> >
> > > > I wrote a script that installs spells into a chroot environement from
> > > > source cache:
> > > >
> > > > http://seth.positivism.org/files/chrootize
> > > >
> > > > http://seth.positivism.org/files/chrootize-example
> > > >
> > > > It uses the dynamic linking checker ldd to recursively follow
> > > > dependencies.
> >
> > As I went only quickly through your source, it basically means that you
> > unpack allready compiled spell from cache to arbitrary directory and
> > follow all dll dependencies ?
>
> This is exactly what it does. It gets you to the point that you can
> then install sorcery if you wanted and run sorcery completely within the
> chroot environment if you so choose. Limited bootstrapping, not a
> complete solution like sorcery is.
>
> Once you have sorcery installed, you could rebuild and change your
> dependencies, like use xfree86-libs instead of a full X server.
>
> >
> > > > I got perl, bash, and GD working in a chroot with the above method. A
> > > > clean chroot that needed perl is in the example.
> > > >
> > > > Just needed to first grab the files: passwd, shadow, group, and
> > > > ld.so.conf from /etc and copy them over into the chroot; then run the
> > > > mkbusybox script to get a basic cli from your already casted busybox;
> > > > then weed out passwd, etc entries for every user you don't need; then
> > > > run the chrootize script on what you need; then lastly chroot in and
> > > > run
> > > > ldconfig.
> > + delete all unnecessary ld.so.conf entries I would say
>
> Yes, although ldconfig ignores them if there's nothing in them. The
> security risk is minimal for having extra directories in there.
>
> >
> > > > I then installed thttpd and set it to my chroot directory, gave it a
> > > > cgi
> > > > pattern of '**.cgi' in /etc/sysconfig/thttpd and perl worked like a
> > > > charm.
> > > >
> > > > I just set my htdoc path to be the same as the root for the chroot,
> > > > but
> > > > if you want to hide your chroot files, you can put it anywhere within
> > > > the chroot and use thttpd's -dd (datadir) argument.
> > > >
> > > > Worry about the complexity of securing apache? I find thttpd is so
> > > > much
> > > > simpler to lock down. Then again, no module mess, either (though you
> > > > may want to use the 'feature' of apache's modules).
> >
> > Since I am prividing subversion repository through ssh, I would like to
> > chroot ssh and subversion. Do you think it's worth ?
>
> ssh is already privilege separated as much as possible. If you want to
> chroot ssh accesses, you could do this, I believe, although I haven't
> tried it. One simple way to have ssh chroot after login (instead of
> running the daemon within a chroot to begin with) is to set the profile
> script of your user shell to run a setuid binary that is able to chroot
> and switch back to the user it started under and return exit code 1 when
> exiting so as to force a logout. It's a crazy idea, but it might work.
> Chrooting the daemon might be easier, but it would require you have
> multiple copies of sshd running, possibly on separate ports if you only
> have one IP address (might be the safest route since you can have
> separate user accounts within the chroot environment).
>
> With a grsecurity patched kernel you can provide much more detailed
> control over what happens in a chroot jail.
>
> >
> > > and the main reason I installed busybox was to have a working ldconfig
> > > ... but if you have glibc installed, ldconfig is installed to /sbin.
> > >
> > > So you don't even need busybox.
> >
> > Are you sure you will be able to enter the chrooted environment without
> > busybox ? I don't want to copy my whole system to chroot :) Well, best
> > is to try myself :)
>
> Yep, it will work fine. A lot of chroot environments have nothing in
> them except data files (for example, anonymous ftp servers often used
> this trick).
>
> >
> > > I might modify the chrootize script to automatically ldconfig the
> > > environment and setup the /etc files, although since Hamish's iso work,
> > > most of the /etc stuff is handled pretty well automatically.
> > >
> > > Seth
> > >
> > --
> > Neuron
>
>
>
> > _______________________________________________
> > SM-Discuss mailing list
> > SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> > http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
>
>
> --
> Seth Alan Woolley [seth at positivism.org], SPAM/UCE is unauthorized
> Key id EF10E21A = 36AD 8A92 8499 8439 E6A8 3724 D437 AF5D EF10 E21A
> http://smgl.positivism.org:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xEF10E21A
> Security Team Leader Source Mage GNU/Linux http://www.sourcemage.org
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Discuss mailing list
> SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
--
__________________________________________________________________________
|Andrew D. Stitt | astitt at sourcemage.org |
|irc: afrayedknot | afrayedknot at t.armory.com |
|aim: thefrayedknot or iteratorplusplus | |
|Sorcery Team Lead, Porting Team Lead | |
|Grimoire Guru ham/smgl | ftp://t.armory.com |
|Author and Maintainer of Prometheus | |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
[SM-Discuss] chrootizing spells into a chroot for secure web serving with thttpd,
Seth Alan Woolley, 05/09/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] chrootizing spells into a chroot for secure web serving with thttpd,
Seth Alan Woolley, 05/09/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] chrootizing spells into a chroot for secure web serving with thttpd,
VladimĂr Marek, 05/13/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] chrootizing spells into a chroot for secure web serving with thttpd,
Seth Alan Woolley, 05/13/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] chrootizing spells into a chroot for secure web serving with thttpd,
Andrew, 05/14/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] chrootizing spells into a chroot for secure web serving with thttpd,
Seth Alan Woolley, 05/14/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] chrootizing spells into a chroot for secure web serving with thttpd, Eric Sandall, 05/14/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] chrootizing spells into a chroot for secure web serving with thttpd,
Seth Alan Woolley, 05/14/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] chrootizing spells into a chroot for secure web serving with thttpd,
Andrew, 05/14/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] chrootizing spells into a chroot for secure web serving with thttpd,
Seth Alan Woolley, 05/13/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] chrootizing spells into a chroot for secure web serving with thttpd,
VladimĂr Marek, 05/13/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] chrootizing spells into a chroot for secure web serving with thttpd,
Seth Alan Woolley, 05/09/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.