Public SourceMage Discussion List

[Jason Flatt <jason AT flattfamily.com>]

On Friday 09 April 2004 9:06 am, Eric Sandall wrote:
> I noticed that Hamish was shorting the SHORT descriptions and that usually
> it was just a removal of the spell's name from SHORT. Should we make it a
> policy not to be redundant in SHORT by included the spell name in it?
>
> -sandalle

I was making it a habit of putting the spell's name in the short description 
for search purposes.  Until the inclusion of the -name option, if the name 
wasn't in the short or long description, the spell wouldn't be found.  I 
guess now it's not really necessary to be putting the name in either 
description.

-- 
Jason Flatt (jason @ flattfamily . com)
Father of five (http://www.flattfamily.com/)
Linux user (http://www.sourcemage.org/)
IRC Nick: Oadae  Channels: #sourcemage, #lvlug  Server: irc.freenode.net

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GCS/IT d(-) s+:- a>++++ C++$(+++) UL++++ P(+) L+++ E- W++ N+@ o? K? w-- O? 
M-- V PS- PE+ Y+ PGP@ t 5+ X R tv--() b+@ DI+@ D+++ G e h---- r+++ y++++
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------