sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Vladimír Marek <vlmarek AT volny.cz>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Re: Kernel 2.4 vs 2.6
- Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 10:51:16 +0200
On St, bře 31, 2004 at 08:06:32 +0000, Mathieu L wrote:
>
> >
> > Yes, yes, more people go to test 2.6 so that paranoics as me will
> > eventually might change too :)
> >
> > --
> > Neuron
>
[...]
> Though there is still this nice ¨non-scsi¨ burning to try ... ;)
If you mean non ide-scsi emulation burning, you can try that on 2.4.x
too, just disable ide-scsi emulation and try 'cdrecord -scanbus
dev=ATAPI'.
However the big 'advantage' of direct ATAPI access is that it don't
support DMA yet.
--
Neuron
-
[SM-Discuss] Re: Kernel 2.4 vs 2.6,
Mathieu L, 03/31/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Re: Kernel 2.4 vs 2.6, Vladimír Marek, 03/31/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Re: Kernel 2.4 vs 2.6,
Robin Sheat, 03/31/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Re: Kernel 2.4 vs 2.6, Arwed von Merkatz, 03/31/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.