sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: "Mathieu L" <lejatorn AT linuxmail.org>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: [SM-Discuss] Re: Kernel 2.4 vs 2.6
- Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 08:06:32 +0000
>
> Yes, yes, more people go to test 2.6 so that paranoics as me will
> eventually might change too :)
>
> --
> Neuron
-->Honestly, I was about to do so but since I'm not running any web server
I'm now not as much enthusiastic as I was before before about that. Though
there is still this nice ¨non-scsi¨ burning to try ... ;)
I'd like to know for those who have tried 2.6 if they really think it's worth
it for a workstation only? Is there any drawback compared to 2.4? According
to the article, 2.6 seems to be a bit slower to compile stuff, isn't that
quite relevant for Sourcemage running on a workstation?
Lejatorn.
------------------------------------------------
We are Microsoft. Linux is irrelevant.
Openness is futile. Prepare to be assimilated.
------------------------------------------------
--
______________________________________________
Check out the latest SMS services @ http://www.linuxmail.org
This allows you to send and receive SMS through your mailbox.
Powered by Outblaze
-
[SM-Discuss] Re: Kernel 2.4 vs 2.6,
Mathieu L, 03/31/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Re: Kernel 2.4 vs 2.6, Vladimír Marek, 03/31/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Re: Kernel 2.4 vs 2.6,
Robin Sheat, 03/31/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Re: Kernel 2.4 vs 2.6, Arwed von Merkatz, 03/31/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.