sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: "David Kowis" <dkowis AT shlrm.org>
- To: "'discuss'" <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: RE: [SM-Discuss] Versioned Sorcery tarballs
- Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 16:42:01 -0600
Sounds good, and then sorcery update can just touch it to see if the version
is newer, it doesn't have to download the whole thing first. Not like that's
lots of bandwidth, but being frugal isn't bad.
-----Original Message-----
From: sm-discuss-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org
[mailto:sm-discuss-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org] On Behalf Of Geoffrey Derber
Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2004 1:22 PM
To: discuss
Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Versioned Sorcery tarballs
Eric Sandall wrote:
> I was just thinking that it'd be nice for people to download past versions
of
> Sorcery (to check when certain bugs were brought in, see how far we've
come,
> etc.) and to do this we'd need to put versioned tarballs on
> http://download.sourcemage.org/sorcery/, not just the
> "sorcery-<branch>.tar.bz2". We could just have the "sorcery-stable.tar.bz2
->
> sorcery-<latest>.tar.bz2", while "sorcery-devel.tar.bz2" would stay as it
is
> (no point in versioning that).
>
> Thoughts?
>
> -sandalle
>
I thought we were going to do that a while back.
Geoff
_______________________________________________
SM-Discuss mailing list
SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
-
[SM-Discuss] Versioned Sorcery tarballs,
Eric Sandall, 03/23/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Versioned Sorcery tarballs,
Geoffrey Derber, 03/23/2004
- RE: [SM-Discuss] Versioned Sorcery tarballs, David Kowis, 03/24/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Versioned Sorcery tarballs, Hamish Greig, 03/24/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Versioned Sorcery tarballs,
Geoffrey Derber, 03/23/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.