sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Eric Sandall <eric AT sandall.us>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] can't build xfree86-devel
- Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 08:38:41 -0800
Quoting Christian Mertes <c_mertes AT t-online.de>:
> That's not my point. I'm fine with two spells for stable and
> devel X. It's just that the "devel" linux changes to stable,
> too, when stable is newer than the prepatch versions. It didn't
> some time ago IIRC and I really appreciate it does so now. I
> just wanted to suggest the X spells to adopt this philosophy
> (devel is the newest X available, unless you want CVS and
> stable, well it's the latest stable). There's no point in using
> an old unstable version when you can have a new stable one, is
> there?
The problem is that some don't like the license of the new XFree86, so
xfree86-devel is the latest "safe" license version of XFree86, with
xfree86-4.3
being the latest "safe" stable release. So in that context it's setup as
you're
thinking it should be.
-sandalle
--
PGP Key Fingerprint: FCFF 26A1 BE21 08F4 BB91 FAED 1D7B 7D74 A8EF DD61
http://search.keyserver.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xA8EFDD61
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GCS/E/IT$ d-- s++:+>: a-- C++(+++) BL++++VIS>$ P+(++) L+++ E-(---) W++ N+@ o?
K? w++++>-- O M-@ V-- PS+(+++) PE(-) Y++(+) PGP++(+) t+() 5++ X(+) R+(++)
tv(--)b++(+++) DI+@ D++(+++) G>+++ e>+++ h---(++) r++ y+
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
Eric Sandall | Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
eric AT sandall.us | http://www.sourcemage.org/
http://eric.sandall.us/ | SysAdmin @ Inst. Shock Physics @ WSU
http://counter.li.org/ #196285 | http://www.shock.wsu.edu/
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
-
[SM-Discuss] can't build xfree86-devel,
Jeremy Kolb, 03/09/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] can't build xfree86-devel,
Christian Mertes, 03/10/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] can't build xfree86-devel,
Ladislav Hagara, 03/10/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] can't build xfree86-devel, Jeremy Kolb, 03/10/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] can't build xfree86-devel,
Christian Mertes, 03/10/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] can't build xfree86-devel,
Eric Sandall, 03/10/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] can't build xfree86-devel,
Christian Mertes, 03/11/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] can't build xfree86-devel, Eric Sandall, 03/12/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] can't build xfree86-devel,
Christian Mertes, 03/11/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] can't build xfree86-devel,
Eric Sandall, 03/10/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] can't build xfree86-devel,
Peter Schneider-Kamp, 03/10/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] can't build xfree86-devel, Jason Flatt, 03/10/2004
-
[SM-Discuss] can't build openoffice,
Chris Dennis, 03/10/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] can't build openoffice, Eric Sandall, 03/10/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] can't build xfree86-devel,
Ladislav Hagara, 03/10/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] can't build xfree86-devel,
Eric Sandall, 03/10/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] can't build xfree86-devel, Jeremy Kolb, 03/10/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] can't build xfree86-devel,
Christian Mertes, 03/10/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] can't build xfree86-devel, Eric Sandall, 03/10/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] can't build xfree86-devel,
Steven Pinkham, 03/10/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] can't build xfree86-devel, Andrew, 03/10/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] can't build xfree86-devel,
Christian Mertes, 03/10/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.