sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
Re: [SM-Discuss] Re: [SM-Admin] Source Mage admin meeting - 07 March 2004, 1400 GMT
- From: Paul <dufflebunk AT dufflebunk.homeip.net>
- To: sm-discuss <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Re: [SM-Admin] Source Mage admin meeting - 07 March 2004, 1400 GMT
- Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2004 14:10:46 -0500
Hee hee, well, the sorcery team at least has pretty much had votes...
since there's only ever one candidate cazy enough to want to head the
team ;) Seriously though, the grimoire and sorcery teams are
different. While the grimoire team is large and may need a vote, the
sorcery team is not large, and with only one person ever wanting the
team lead, a vote isn't necessary IMO.
But if you're considering voting for team leads, who gets to vote? All
users, all developers, or only team members?
On Tue, 2004-03-02 at 07:39, Hamish Greig wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Tue, 2 Mar 2004 21:56, Unet wrote:
> I agree.
> I have known of this decision for a while but in light of recent problems
> with
> project communications I now think all team leaders should be
> democratically
> chosen/voted. It is not enough just to want to do a job, you must also
> agree
> to discuss problems with other people, other team leads and respect the
> will
> and desires of the community.
> Nominations, nominees being seconded and actual voting is called for if
> this
> project hopes to progress in accordance with the wills and desires of its
> developers and users.
> Finally, an open position doesn't need to be filled unless the right
> candidate
> applies, putting people into a role they are ill-equipped to handle will
> cause more problems than solutions and should be avoided.
--
De mortuis nihil nisi bonum.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-
[SM-Discuss] Source Mage admin meeting - 07 March 2004, 1400 GMT,
Eric D. Schabell M.Sc., 03/02/2004
-
[SM-Discuss] Re: [SM-Admin] Source Mage admin meeting - 07 March 2004, 1400 GMT,
Unet, 03/02/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Re: [SM-Admin] Source Mage admin meeting - 07 March 2004, 1400 GMT,
Hamish Greig, 03/02/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Re: [SM-Admin] Source Mage admin meeting - 07 March 2004, 1400 GMT, Arwed von Merkatz, 03/02/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Re: [SM-Admin] Source Mage admin meeting - 07 March 2004, 1400 GMT,
Tony Smith, 03/02/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Re: [SM-Admin] Source Mage admin meeting - 07 March 2004, 1400 GMT,
Hamish Greig, 03/02/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Re: [SM-Admin] Source Mage admin meeting - 07 March 2004, 1400 GMT, Tony Smith, 03/03/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Re: [SM-Admin] Source Mage admin meeting - 07 March 2004, 1400 GMT,
Hamish Greig, 03/02/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Re: [SM-Admin] Source Mage admin meeting - 07 March 2004, 1400 GMT,
Paul, 03/02/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Re: [SM-Admin] Source Mage admin meeting - 07 March 2004, 1400 GMT, Eric Sandall, 03/02/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Re: [SM-Admin] Source Mage admin meeting - 07 March 2004, 1400 GMT,
Hamish Greig, 03/02/2004
-
[SM-Discuss] Re: [SM-Admin] Source Mage admin meeting - 07 March 2004, 1400 GMT,
Unet, 03/02/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.