sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Eric Sandall <eric AT sandall.us>
- To: Arwed von Merkatz <v.merkatz AT gmx.net>
- Cc: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] update on udev on /dev status
- Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 10:08:45 -0800
Quoting Arwed von Merkatz <v.merkatz AT gmx.net>:
> Not sure, the problem is that we only know device names for devfs and
> udev, and the devfs change only involved /devices -> /dev rename, not
> changes like /dev/cdroms/cdrom0 -> /dev/hdd and the other way around. An
> additional problem is that with udev device naming is totally arbitrary,
> and i don't think we should force the user to use certain device names
> (i currently do this for tty devices, until i find a better way).
I think for the initial setup we should set the user's environment to the LSB
default. Perhaps we should ask them if they want to auto-convert those files,
a
la how init.d does it now making sure to tell them that it will use the
default
/dev layout (not devfs layout) before continuing.
-sandalle
--
PGP Key Fingerprint: FCFF 26A1 BE21 08F4 BB91 FAED 1D7B 7D74 A8EF DD61
http://search.keyserver.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xA8EFDD61
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GCS/E/IT$ d-- s++:+>: a-- C++(+++) BL++++VIS>$ P+(++) L+++ E-(---) W++ N+@ o?
K? w++++>-- O M-@ V-- PS+(+++) PE(-) Y++(+) PGP++(+) t+() 5++ X(+) R+(++)
tv(--)b++(+++) DI+@ D++(+++) G>+++ e>+++ h---(++) r++ y+
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
Eric Sandall | Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
eric AT sandall.us | http://www.sourcemage.org/
http://eric.sandall.us/ | SysAdmin @ Inst. Shock Physics @ WSU
http://counter.li.org/ #196285 | http://www.shock.wsu.edu/
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
-
[SM-Discuss] update on udev on /dev status,
Arwed von Merkatz, 03/01/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] update on udev on /dev status, Casey Harkins, 03/01/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] update on udev on /dev status,
Eric Sandall, 03/01/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] update on udev on /dev status,
Arwed von Merkatz, 03/01/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] update on udev on /dev status,
Eric Sandall, 03/01/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] update on udev on /dev status, Arwed von Merkatz, 03/01/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] update on udev on /dev status,
Eric Sandall, 03/01/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] update on udev on /dev status,
Arwed von Merkatz, 03/01/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] update on udev on /dev status, Hamish Greig, 03/01/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] update on udev on /dev status,
Arwed von Merkatz, 03/03/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] update on udev on /dev status,
Eric Sandall, 03/03/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] update on udev on /dev status,
Eric Sandall, 03/03/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] update on udev on /dev status,
Jeremy Kolb, 03/03/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] update on udev on /dev status,
Eric Sandall, 03/03/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] update on udev on /dev status, Bas van Gils, 03/04/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] update on udev on /dev status, Arwed von Merkatz, 03/03/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] update on udev on /dev status,
Eric Sandall, 03/03/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] update on udev on /dev status, Arwed von Merkatz, 03/03/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] update on udev on /dev status,
Jeremy Kolb, 03/03/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] update on udev on /dev status,
Eric Sandall, 03/03/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] update on udev on /dev status,
Eric Sandall, 03/03/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.