sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Mads Laursen <dossen+sgl AT daimi.au.dk>
- To: Public SourceMage Discussion List <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] List etiquette
- Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2003 17:56:50 +0100
On 02/12/03 01.10, Justin Rocha (Xenith) wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 08:18:36AM -0800, in the study, with the lead pipe,
> Andrew wrote:
> > >Duplicate emails can easily be taken care of by a simple procmail
> > >filter, if you
> > > have access to that.
> > since you have a different opinion on this than many of us do, would
> > you mind posting the procmail rule to get rid of duplicates? It would save
> > us all a lot of time and get at least part of this discussion over with.
> I can do that. <looks about for his procmailrc>
>
> # Nuke duplicate messages
> :0 Wh: msgid.lock
> | $FORMAIL -D 8192 msgid.cache
>
> Now, I don't know if this works 100%, because I stole it from someone else.
> But
> it seems to be doing it's job so far. :)
I have precisely the same rule, and I'm very certain that it does it's
job, since I've often had turn it off when testing other procmail
stuff (it's nice to just bounce the same message back at my account,
rather than having to make up new test-mails each time I change
something).
/dossen
Attachment:
pgpFxHfg5W_Xs.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] List etiquette,
Andrew, 12/01/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] List etiquette, Terry Ross, 12/01/2003
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] List etiquette,
Justin Rocha (Xenith), 12/01/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] List etiquette,
Andrew, 12/01/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] List etiquette,
Justin Rocha (Xenith), 12/02/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] List etiquette, Mads Laursen, 12/03/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] List etiquette,
Justin Rocha (Xenith), 12/02/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] List etiquette,
Andrew, 12/01/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.