sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Eric Sandall <eric AT sandall.us>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: RE: Re: [SM-Discuss] List etiquette
- Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2003 11:22:09 -0800
Quoting evraire AT tuwg.com:
> Contrary to Eric, I prefer to include the original sender in the list of
> recipients. I don't know why, but I get direct emails substantially quicker
> than through the mailing list (even though I do not use the digest format).
> When I'm stuck and let out a cry for help, the sooner I get the reply the
> better!
>
> There's my vote! :)
>
> Jonathan Evraire
> evraire at tuwg.com
>
> PS: you'll note in this particular case, in the spirit of the discussion, I
> chose to reply to the list only :)
Thank you. ;)
It's mostly just a nuisance for me (and, it seems, others) when I read an
e-mail, hit the 'next' button, and read the same thing again. I then look at
which one is from the list, and remove the other (I keep personal archives).
With most mailing lists, the delay between a direct e-mail and one sent to the
list is a few seconds (for this list, unless their servers are having
problems,
but that applies to personal ones as well, just in a lesser degree) to a few
minutes (freeglut and freelords lists hosted on SourceForge).
-sandalle
--
PGP Key Fingerprint: FCFF 26A1 BE21 08F4 BB91 FAED 1D7B 7D74 A8EF DD61
http://search.keyserver.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xA8EFDD61
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GCS/E/IT$ d-- s++:+>: a-- C++(+++) BL++++VIS>$ P+(++) L+++ E-(---) W++ N+@ o?
K? w++++>-- O M-@ V-- PS+(+++) PE(-) Y++(+) PGP++(+) t+() 5++ X(+) R+(++)
tv(--)b++(+++) DI+@ D++(+++) G>+++ e>+++ h---(++) r++ y+
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
Eric Sandall | Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
eric AT sandall.us | http://www.sourcemage.org/
http://eric.sandall.us/ | SysAdmin @ Inst. Shock Physics @ WSU
http://counter.li.org/ #196285 | http://www.shock.wsu.edu/
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] List etiquette
, (continued)
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] List etiquette,
Terry Ross, 11/26/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] List etiquette,
Robin Sheat, 11/26/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] List etiquette,
Eric Sandall, 11/26/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] List etiquette,
Robin Sheat, 11/26/2003
- RE: [SM-Discuss] List etiquette, Glenn Shannon, 11/26/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] List etiquette,
Robin Sheat, 11/26/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] List etiquette,
Eric Sandall, 11/26/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] List etiquette, Hamish Greig, 11/26/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] List etiquette,
Robin Sheat, 11/26/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] List etiquette,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 11/26/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] List etiquette, Paul Mahon, 11/26/2003
- [SM-Discuss] list etiquette, Ricardo Izquierdo, 11/26/2003
-
RE: Re: [SM-Discuss] List etiquette,
evraire, 11/26/2003
-
RE: Re: [SM-Discuss] List etiquette,
Eric Sandall, 11/26/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] List etiquette,
Hamish Greig, 11/27/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] List etiquette,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 11/27/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] List etiquette,
Hamish Greig, 11/27/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] List etiquette,
Eric Sandall, 11/30/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] List etiquette, Hamish Greig, 11/30/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] List etiquette, Eric Sandall, 11/30/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] List etiquette, Hamish Greig, 11/30/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] List etiquette,
Eric Sandall, 11/30/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] List etiquette,
Hamish Greig, 11/27/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] List etiquette,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 11/27/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] List etiquette,
Hamish Greig, 11/27/2003
-
RE: Re: [SM-Discuss] List etiquette,
Eric Sandall, 11/26/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] List etiquette,
Terry Ross, 11/26/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.