sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
Re: [SM-Discuss] cmucl-bin doesn't provide LISP? and z-rejected/binary
- From: Geoffrey Derber <gderber AT sourcemage.org>
- To: Jeremy Kolb <jkolb AT brandeis.edu>
- Cc: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] cmucl-bin doesn't provide LISP? and z-rejected/binary
- Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2003 20:44:04 -0600
Jeremy Kolb wrote:
<snip>
but the more i
think about it the more sense it makes, that z-rejected would be for
deprecated or possibly broken spells and binary would be for binary only
spells.
Jeremy
No broken spells, can you imagine the complaints if we had broken spells lying around.
We also do depreciate binary spells, hence the rejection.
On a side note, I believe Eric Sandall was working on a source based version of this, but was having trouble, I don't remember what it was though. If we could get a source version of this, that'd be all the better.
Geoff
-
[SM-Discuss] cmucl-bin doesn't provide LISP? and z-rejected/binary,
Jeremy Kolb, 10/28/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] cmucl-bin doesn't provide LISP? and z-rejected/binary,
Geoffrey Derber, 10/28/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] cmucl-bin doesn't provide LISP? and z-rejected/binary, Eric Sandall, 10/29/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] cmucl-bin doesn't provide LISP? and z-rejected/binary,
Geoffrey Derber, 10/28/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.