sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
Re: [SM-Discuss] smgl-latest doesn't point to latest
- From: Jason Flatt <jason AT flattfamily.com>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] smgl-latest doesn't point to latest
- Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2003 06:49:32 -0800
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday, October 28, 2003 12:36 am, Benoit PAPILLAULT wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think this "latest" link is just a bad idea that was already discussed.
> Why it is a bad idea?
>
> -> the link is always moving (and it's not even a link)
> -> it's wasting space (since it's not a symlink, but a file copy!)
> -> we don't know if it should be updated for pre-releases or only for
> stable releases
lrwxrwxrwx 1 erics sourcema 23 Oct 28 01:48
smgl-latest-i386.iso.bz2 -> smgl-0.7.1-i386.iso.bz2
It is a link. It is not a copy.
> I think that it should be replaced by a single file named
> "LATEST_IS_0.7.1". Btw, the ISO 0.7.1 has been announced on several
> mailing list : sm-admin, sm-announce, sm-users. There is a post
> on http://news.sourcemage.org and http://forums.sourcemage.org. I also
> make an annoucement on freshmeat. All those annoucements have a DIRECT
> link to the proper file.
>
> So, how people belonging to the core sourcemage team STILL download
> "latest" ??? Aren't you all suscribed to sm-admin (we have been told that
> it's for developpers recently)?
I rarely download any file labeled 'latest' or 'current' or what ever. I
want
to feel reasonably confident that the file I am downloading is the version I
believe I want. I don't usually get that confidence with a 'latest' linked
or named file.
I think that if the files are correctly named, a 'latest' link and a 'LATEST'
file are both unnecessary. I've never quite understood why people do the
extra work.
> Btw, did someone notice the new download area where you can see whole
> filename? ... or am I just wasting my time? :-(
I noticed, also. I think it looks good.
> Waiting for comments,
> Benoit PAPILLAULT, ISO Guru
- --
Jason Flatt (jason @ flattfamily . com)
Father of five (http://www.flattfamily.com/)
Linux user (http://www.sourcemage.org/)
IRC Nick: Oadae Channels: #sourcemage, #lvlug Server: irc.freenode.net
PGP Key: E992213F - 0254 9DB7 BE0E 312D 8352 6E39 0700 FB95 E992 213F
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/noH8BwD7lemSIT8RAqMpAJ0d3zda+q5MqXm9tDQODFqhEtX5SgCfffwI
+B0kLC1nI8u/Zx6IZEO3uYU=
=kIEB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
[SM-Discuss] smgl-latest doesn't point to latest,
Eric Sandall, 10/28/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] smgl-latest doesn't point to latest,
Hamish Greig, 10/28/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] smgl-latest doesn't point to latest, Jason Flatt, 10/28/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] smgl-latest doesn't point to latest, Jason Flatt, 10/28/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] smgl-latest doesn't point to latest,
Benoit PAPILLAULT, 10/28/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] smgl-latest doesn't point to latest, Seth Alan Woolley, 10/28/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] smgl-latest doesn't point to latest, Hamish Greig, 10/28/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] smgl-latest doesn't point to latest, Jason Flatt, 10/28/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] smgl-latest doesn't point to latest,
Eric Sandall, 10/28/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] smgl-latest doesn't point to latest,
Laurent Wandrebeck, 10/28/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] smgl-latest doesn't point to latest, Eric Sandall, 10/31/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] smgl-latest doesn't point to latest,
Laurent Wandrebeck, 10/28/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] smgl-latest doesn't point to latest,
Hamish Greig, 10/28/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.