sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Hamish Greig <hgreig AT bigpond.net.au>
- To: sm-discuss <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] openmotif/lesstif
- Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2003 00:10:09 +1000
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 2 Oct 2003 23:49, Ladislav Hagara wrote:
> openmotif is in x11 section and lesstif is in libs section. I think lesstif
> should go to X11 section too.
> lesstif does not content CONFLICTS file (conflicts openmmotif). May I
> correct it ?
Either fix it yourself or file a bug (i tend to fix little things like this
myself to avoid the paperwork in bugzilla)
We now have an X11 (Justin "Xenith" Rocha) guru again so it is once again
possible to assign bugs to someone :)
> I think both provides motif is good.
Me too
> What about change all GenericDependences
> http://wiki.sourcemage.org/index.php?page=GenericDependences to capitals.
> We should prefer spell names in lowercases and generic dependences in
> capitals, IMHO.
> So, better is "provides MOTIF".
>
> "requires" is deprecated in devel sorcery:
> depends = requires + depends
> optional_depends = optional_depends + "optional_requires"
>
> So, we could know by name if it is a spell name or generic dependence.
>
> - lace -
I think we kind of need to push the requires=depends changes into stable
sorcery as soon as we can. (obviously the decision is for the sorcery team
to decide)
It will be a lot of interim work with spells like xll-libs and so-on
otherwise
and I definitely want to work smarter not harder.
About the provides MOTIF I don't know that i like capitals much anymore(
since
i do enough shouting allready) but i don't have any other alternative in mind
so I will just go with the flow.
Hamish
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/fDHB8fSufZR6424RAq9kAJ9+EGjj89nY9E1IWIh4d7aiy8KGdQCfU1Cd
CnOVqaiYuiF53QL8WoglzYs=
=cAbQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
[SM-Discuss] openmotif/lesstif,
Duane Malcolm, 10/02/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] openmotif/lesstif,
Eric Sandall, 10/02/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] openmotif/lesstif,
Ladislav Hagara, 10/02/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] openmotif/lesstif,
Hamish Greig, 10/02/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] openmotif/lesstif, Paul Mahon, 10/02/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] openmotif/lesstif,
Eric Sandall, 10/02/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] openmotif/lesstif, Geoffrey Derber, 10/02/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] openmotif/lesstif,
Geoffrey Derber, 10/02/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] openmotif/lesstif, Ladislav Hagara, 10/05/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] openmotif/lesstif,
Hamish Greig, 10/02/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] openmotif/lesstif,
Ladislav Hagara, 10/02/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] openmotif/lesstif,
Paul Mahon, 10/02/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] openmotif/lesstif,
Duane Malcolm, 10/02/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] openmotif/lesstif, Paul Mahon, 10/02/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] openmotif/lesstif,
Duane Malcolm, 10/02/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] openmotif/lesstif,
Eric Sandall, 10/02/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.