sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Ladislav Hagara <hgr AT vabo.cz>
- Cc: sm-discuss <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] openmotif/lesstif
- Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2003 15:49:11 +0200
> > If a spell like nedit or grace "requires" either openmotif or lesstif,
> > how do I get this setup and what should the "requires ????" be, "tif"?
>
> Probably call the provides 'motif', as that's what widget/gui they're
> trying to
> provide. I haven't tried nedit in a long time (vim is all I need to keep me
> company late at night fixing bugz).
openmotif is in x11 section and lesstif is in libs section. I think lesstif
should
go to X11 section too.
lesstif does not content CONFLICTS file (conflicts openmmotif). May I correct
it ?
I think both provides motif is good.
What about change all GenericDependences
http://wiki.sourcemage.org/index.php?page=GenericDependences to capitals.
We should prefer spell names in lowercases and generic dependences in
capitals,
IMHO.
So, better is "provides MOTIF".
"requires" is deprecated in devel sorcery:
depends = requires + depends
optional_depends = optional_depends + "optional_requires"
So, we could know by name if it is a spell name or generic dependence.
- lace -
-
[SM-Discuss] openmotif/lesstif,
Duane Malcolm, 10/02/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] openmotif/lesstif,
Eric Sandall, 10/02/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] openmotif/lesstif,
Ladislav Hagara, 10/02/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] openmotif/lesstif,
Hamish Greig, 10/02/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] openmotif/lesstif, Paul Mahon, 10/02/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] openmotif/lesstif,
Eric Sandall, 10/02/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] openmotif/lesstif, Geoffrey Derber, 10/02/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] openmotif/lesstif,
Geoffrey Derber, 10/02/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] openmotif/lesstif, Ladislav Hagara, 10/05/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] openmotif/lesstif,
Hamish Greig, 10/02/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] openmotif/lesstif,
Ladislav Hagara, 10/02/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] openmotif/lesstif,
Paul Mahon, 10/02/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] openmotif/lesstif,
Duane Malcolm, 10/02/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] openmotif/lesstif, Paul Mahon, 10/02/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] openmotif/lesstif,
Duane Malcolm, 10/02/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] openmotif/lesstif,
Eric Sandall, 10/02/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.