sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Robin <robin AT kallisti.net.nz>
- To: David Kowis <dkowis AT shlrm.org>
- Cc: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] mail
- Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2003 17:42:51 +1200
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 10:29:45PM -0500, David Kowis wrote:
> <brainstorm>
I think you are right, Sorcerer doesn't work. Sorcerers don't have to
use a grimoire to cast spells, and they are much more restricted in the
spells they can cast, compared to wizards. Also they aren't so good at
higher levels.
> "Wizard"
> "thaumaturge"
I like both of these, or maybe just straight "Mage"
> "practicioner"
"Like a doctor" is my first thought :)
> "linuxmancer" "nixmancer" (like necromancer, but lamer)
> "the master" (i dunno like some kind of summoned creature speaks to its
> summoner)
> "sourcemancer"
> "bitmancer"
> "gnumancer" -doesn't really work, because everything's not gnu
To me, these sounds a bit clunky.
> "Source Magus"
This has a nice ring, or just "Magus".
My $0.02 :)
--
Robin <robin AT kallisti.net.nz> JabberID: <eythian AT jabber.org>
Hostes alienigeni me abduxerunt. Qui annus est?
PGP Key 0x776DB663 Fingerprint=DD10 5C62 1E29 A385 9866 0853 CD38 E07A 776D
B663
Attachment:
pgpmAZhcaxVfw.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-
[SM-Discuss] mail,
Jeremy Kolb, 09/19/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] mail,
Ladislav Hagara, 09/21/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] mail,
Eric Sandall, 09/21/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] mail, Robin Cook, 09/21/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] mail,
Ladislav Hagara, 09/22/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] mail,
Eric Sandall, 09/22/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] mail,
David Kowis, 09/22/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] mail, Robin, 09/23/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] mail,
David Kowis, 09/22/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] mail,
Eric Sandall, 09/22/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] mail,
Eric Sandall, 09/21/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] mail,
Ladislav Hagara, 09/21/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.