sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Jeremy Kolb <jkolb AT brandeis.edu>
- To: Hamish Greig <hgreig AT bigpond.net.au>
- Cc: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org, Eric Sandall <eric AT sandall.us>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] perl conflicts w/perl?!
- Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 01:09:55 -0500
Thanks Hamish! Seems to be compiling fine. I'll let you know if it blows
up. Thanks
Jeremy
On Wed, 2003-09-10 at 00:06, Hamish Greig wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Wed, 10 Sep 2003 14:51, Jeremy A. Kolb wrote:
> > So at the moment I can't recompile it?
> >
> > On Tue, 9 Sep 2003, Eric Sandall wrote:
> > > Quoting "Jeremy A. Kolb" <jkolb AT brandeis.edu>:
> > > > why is perl conflicts withitself? cast fix will not fix it (libdb
> > > > version) because it
> > > > conflicts with itself. That's not cool.
> > >
> > > The reason this is a problem is that perl is considered sustained
> > > software (I forget why, any ideas?). I believe perl won't compile
> > > properly if it exists during the compilation, so conflicts was supposed
> > > to take care of this, but it will not dispel itself due to being
> > > sustained.
> > >
> > > Ideas? Corrections?
> > >
> > > -sandalle
> >
> I asked that perl get added to sustained list as it is needed in basesystem
> and if it is dispelled you can't do a sorcery rebuild. But i think at that
> time it wasn't in basesystem DEPENDS.
> Maybe we should remove it from sustained list and leave it in basesystem
> DEPENDS so a sorcery rebuild will find it not installed and cast it ?
> That would fix this problem i think
> jkolb, for now just remove perl from /var/lib/sorcery/sustained and then it
> will behave as you want it too.
> Hamish
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQE/XrFD8fSufZR6424RAk2RAJ9YaEAgo6pN8tKZ2U0JoT8l3WT7OQCfW/TX
> SOuYKjJwK4WRhnJ9mUi1p4A=
> =Ldvh
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
-
[SM-Discuss] perl conflicts w/perl?!,
Jeremy A. Kolb, 09/10/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] perl conflicts w/perl?!,
Eric Sandall, 09/10/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] perl conflicts w/perl?!,
Jeremy A. Kolb, 09/10/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] perl conflicts w/perl?!,
Hamish Greig, 09/10/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] perl conflicts w/perl?!, Jeremy Kolb, 09/10/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] perl conflicts w/perl?!,
Hamish Greig, 09/10/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] perl conflicts w/perl?!,
Arwed von Merkatz, 09/13/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] perl conflicts w/perl?!,
Hamish Greig, 09/13/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] perl conflicts w/perl?!, Eric Sandall, 09/13/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] perl conflicts w/perl?!,
Hamish Greig, 09/13/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] perl conflicts w/perl?!,
Jeremy A. Kolb, 09/10/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] perl conflicts w/perl?!,
Eric Sandall, 09/10/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.