sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
Re: [SM-Discuss] Re: [SM-Spell-Submit] New Game spell: enemy-territory
- From: Zach Hobbs <zach-list AT firstwavedesign.com>
- To: Hamish Greig <hgreig AT bigpond.net.au>
- Cc: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Re: [SM-Spell-Submit] New Game spell: enemy-territory
- Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2003 21:02:10 -0500
We could create a "z-rej-games" or even a games codex? If it was a separate
codex then you could have them in separate sections: "games-arcade" etc. And
those not interested in games don't have to subscribe to that codex. Just an
idea..
-Zach Hobbs
On Sunday 15 June 2003 7:39 pm, Hamish Greig wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 10:11, Sergey A. Lipnevich wrote:
> > Binaries go into z-rejected.
>
> Many apologies for the crosspost i want a lot of feed back on this
>
> ONce i have finished my current spree there will be atleast a dozen binary
> games, i had not planned on putting them all into z-rejected.
> Some other solution must be reached. I believe Games should become an
> exception due to the proprietary nature of many games.
> They should still have warnings and default to not installing
> (enemy-territory does this, like a z-rejected) but should be locatable
> within the Games section.
> ATM i am doing an inventory of games to see if it is worth moving them into
> a seperate grimoire or whether we need to add "services" like arcade and
> shooter so a gaze provides will list games by genre ? Games section now has
> 160+ spells and is not going to get any smaller, as well 17 of those are
> "libs" only used by games.
> Once my stocktake is done i will come up with a proposal.
>
> Lastly how do Bernardo and Asha'aman feel about maintaining a dozen games,
> some of which are over 350MB in download size and 800MB installed size ?
> I don't mind doing the work needed to spellarize these games for our users
> and i would like an open, honest (helpful) discussion about placements and
> such. Single line responses are often similar to "grunts" or "shrugs" and
> can be misread.
> Hamish
>
> - --
> Do You SMuGL!?
> Linux so advanced it may as well be magic!
> Everything you'll ever need on one web page
> http://www.sourcemage.org/
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> Defenestrate yourself! Free yourself from Redmond!
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQE+7RHV8fSufZR6424RApPMAJ4gl6aj9o12t3chOHJkb7Ji/2mqTACcCTaJ
> 31wrouO2L8YTD7BVPV5FXRI=
> =62pd
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Discuss mailing list
> SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
-
[SM-Discuss] Re: [SM-Spell-Submit] New Game spell: enemy-territory,
Hamish Greig, 06/15/2003
- [SM-Discuss] Re: [SM-Spell-Submit] New Game spell: enemy-territory, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 06/15/2003
-
[SM-Discuss] Re: [SM-Spell-Submit] New Game spell: enemy-territory,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 06/15/2003
-
[SM-Discuss] Re: [SM-Grimoire] Re: [SM-Spell-Submit] New Game spell: enemy-territory,
Seth Woolley, 06/16/2003
- [SM-Discuss] Re: [SM-Grimoire] Re: [SM-Spell-Submit] New Game spell: enemy-territory, Hamish Greig, 06/16/2003
-
[SM-Discuss] Re: [SM-Grimoire] Re: [SM-Spell-Submit] New Game spell: enemy-territory,
Seth Woolley, 06/16/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Re: [SM-Spell-Submit] New Game spell: enemy-territory, Zach Hobbs, 06/15/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.