sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Spencer Ogden <spencero AT mail.utexas.edu>
- To: SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] ncurses, slang, and gcc, oh my!
- Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2002 14:24:52 -0600
Don't several spells dispel and resurect automake and autoconf as needed? I
thinks this is what Dufflebunk mentioned in his last email. Restoring from
a cached compile is pretty quick. The files could be 'hidden' by
dispelling them, and then recasting
Spencer
On Friday 13 December 2002 02:20 pm, Christian Sonne wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 11:09:14AM -0800, Eric Sandall wrote:
> > Well, apparently slang has the same problem as ncurses, with regards
> > to gcc installing their own version.
> >
> > I recall someone saying (or gainsaying, don't recall) that recompiling
> > gcc after ncurses is updated would fix the ncurses.h file which gcc
> > installs, so that we'd no longer have to remove it after an ncurses
> > update (it is a Bad Thing (TM) to remove files from a spells
> > installation, makes them "corrupted" for 'cast --fix').
>
> not knowing _exactly_ how --fix works, but asuming it does something
> like check if the files from the install-log are existing, then wouldn't
> it be better to just make the spell tamper with the install-log, remove
> the desired line, so it won't corrupt during fix?
>
> having to recompile gcc is arguably better than corrupting spells, but
> imho still a Bad Thing (TM).
>
> FreakCERS
>
> > So, if recompiling gcc after ncurses (and slang) fixes those, we
> > should add triggers to gcc so that it recompiles after these are
> > updated (and any others that people find). I haven't tried
> > recompiling gcc to see if this works (recompiling now, but it's a
> > PII-300, so it'll take a while. ;)), but if anyone else knows/can try
> > faster, please do.
> >
> > Here is the slang info:
> > http://bugs.sourcemage.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1957
> >
> > Thoughts?
> >
> > -One of Four
> > a.k.a. sandalle
> >
> > --
> > PGP Key 0x5C8D199A5A317214
> > http://search.keyserver.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x5A317214
> >
> > Eric Sandall | Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
> > eric AT sandall.us | http://www.sourcemage.org
> > http://www.sandall.us/~sandalle | SysAdmin @ Inst. Shock Physics @
> > WSU http://counter.li.org #196285 | http://www.shock.wsu.edu/
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > SM-Discuss mailing list
> > SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> > http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
-
[SM-Discuss] ncurses, slang, and gcc, oh my!,
Eric Sandall, 12/13/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] ncurses, slang, and gcc, oh my!,
Christian Sonne, 12/13/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] ncurses, slang, and gcc, oh my!,
Spencer Ogden, 12/13/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] ncurses, slang, and gcc, oh my!, Casey Harkins, 12/13/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] ncurses, slang, and gcc, oh my!,
Eric Sandall, 12/13/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] ncurses, slang, and gcc, oh my!, Casey Harkins, 12/13/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] ncurses, slang, and gcc, oh my!,
Dufflebunk, 12/13/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] ncurses, slang, and gcc, oh my!, M.L., 12/13/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] ncurses, slang, and gcc, oh my!,
Spencer Ogden, 12/13/2002
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
-
[SM-Discuss] ncurses, slang, and gcc, oh my!,
Jimmy Yen(???), 12/16/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] ncurses, slang, and gcc, oh my!, Julian v. Bock, 12/16/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] ncurses, slang, and gcc, oh my!, M.L., 12/16/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] ncurses, slang, and gcc, oh my!,
Christian Sonne, 12/13/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.