sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
Re: [SM-Discuss] More - non-bad-RAM - GCC problems
- From: julian AT openit.de (Julian v. Bock)
- To: Robin <robin AT kallisti.2y.net>
- Cc: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] More - non-bad-RAM - GCC problems
- Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2002 10:21:57 +0100
Hi
>>>>> "R" == Robin <robin AT kallisti.2y.net> writes:
R> I don't know for sure, however I recall a compile a little while
R> back. Anyway, I'll let you know how well it goes with a recompile
R> of glibc. (assuming it should be glibc that gets recompiled, not
R> gettext)
Yes, glibc needs to be recompiled after the gettext update.
I have added gettext as glibc dep (because of the build order) and
updated the glibc UPDATED field.
Julian
-
[SM-Discuss] More - non-bad-RAM - GCC problems,
Robin, 12/09/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] More - non-bad-RAM - GCC problems,
Julian v. Bock, 12/09/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] More - non-bad-RAM - GCC problems,
Robin, 12/09/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] More - non-bad-RAM - GCC problems,
Julian v. Bock, 12/09/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] More - non-bad-RAM - GCC problems, Robin, 12/09/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] More - non-bad-RAM - GCC problems,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 12/09/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] More - non-bad-RAM - GCC problems,
Julian v. Bock, 12/10/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] More - non-bad-RAM - GCC problems, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 12/11/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] More - non-bad-RAM - GCC problems,
Julian v. Bock, 12/10/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] More - non-bad-RAM - GCC problems,
Julian v. Bock, 12/09/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] More - non-bad-RAM - GCC problems,
Robin, 12/09/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] More - non-bad-RAM - GCC problems,
Julian v. Bock, 12/09/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.