sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Jeremy Kolb <jkolb AT brandeis.edu>
- To: Dufflebunk <dufflebunk AT dufflebunk.homeip.net>
- Cc: Arwed von Merkatz <v.merkatz AT gmx.net>, sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] mozilla reverted?
- Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 03:08:26 -0500
ugh, got 1.1 to compile with the xft2 stuff and let me say that the fonts are HIDEOUS! the test in the main web pages i can deal with but the menus and the text in the To: fields and what not are way to huge. anyone know how to fix this? also it doesn't seem to detect my truetype fonts anymore even though i edited that file like in the wiki.
Jeremy
Dufflebunk wrote:
I built mozilla 1.2b manualt without too much problem for gtk+2,
including xft and fontconfig. I filed a bug with the configure switches
I used. No patching was necessary.
Haven't tried the spell yet.
On Fri, 2002-11-22 at 02:56, Arwed von Merkatz wrote:
On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 12:08:49AM -0600, Casey Harkins wrote:
Has anyone had luck with the mozilla spell + xft2/fontconfig? I've saidI've been running mozilla with Xft2/fontconfig for quite some time.
yes to the option, but compilation always fails. Hadn't had time to check
if a bug has been filed.
-casey
How to get it running depends on the mozilla version, for 1.1 you need
the patch included in the spell, for 1.2b you don't. You need to pass
--enable-xft to configure (the spell doesn't do that, don't know if i
forgot it when adding Xft2 support...). I haven't tested if it works with the
gtk2 patch.
--
Arwed
aka alley_cat
_______________________________________________
SM-Discuss mailing list
SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
-
[SM-Discuss] mozilla reverted?,
Jeremy Kolb, 11/22/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] mozilla reverted?,
Eric Sandall, 11/22/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] mozilla reverted?,
Casey Harkins, 11/22/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] mozilla reverted?,
Arwed von Merkatz, 11/22/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] mozilla reverted?,
Dufflebunk, 11/22/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] mozilla reverted?,
Jeremy Kolb, 11/22/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] mozilla reverted?,
Arwed von Merkatz, 11/22/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] mozilla reverted?, Jeremy Kolb, 11/22/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] mozilla reverted?, Arwed von Merkatz, 11/22/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] mozilla reverted?, Jeremy Kolb, 11/22/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] mozilla reverted?, Jonathan Evraire, 11/22/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] mozilla reverted?, Arwed von Merkatz, 11/22/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] mozilla reverted?, Jeremy Kolb, 11/22/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] mozilla reverted?,
Arwed von Merkatz, 11/22/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] mozilla reverted?,
Jeremy Kolb, 11/22/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] mozilla reverted?,
Dufflebunk, 11/22/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] mozilla reverted?,
Arwed von Merkatz, 11/22/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] mozilla reverted?, M.L., 11/22/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] mozilla reverted?,
Casey Harkins, 11/22/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] mozilla reverted?,
Eric Sandall, 11/22/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.