sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
Re: [SM-Discuss] Tell me again why we aren't using CVS for the grimoire?
- From: "Ryan Abrams" <rabrams AT sourcemage.org>
- To: <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>, "Michael Taylor" <tcm AT adelphia.net>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Tell me again why we aren't using CVS for the grimoire?
- Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2002 16:55:30 -0600
The original design of sorcery didn't allow for this. It seems to me that
scribe would allow for something like this pretty easily actually. But it
was never implemented pre-1.0, and now we are feature frozen.
I am pretty sure we will have incremental updates for the 2.0 series,
whenever that happens. As far as the 1.x series, not so sure.
-Ryan
----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Taylor" <tcm AT adelphia.net>
To: <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 4:43 PM
Subject: [SM-Discuss] Tell me again why we aren't using CVS for the
grimoire?
> I'm very inexperienced with CVS, but as far as I can tell the grimoire is
> an ideal application for it. I can't see how it can worsen the bandwidth
> cost to ibiblio, especially now that system updates are easily a megabyte.
> Gentoo uses it, but then again they have the means to store all of their
> source code on their own servers. How bad is the RAM/processor load with a
> big CVS server?
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> Michael Taylor
> tcm AT adelphia.net
> ICQ: 1938799
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Discuss mailing list
> SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
>
-
[SM-Discuss] Tell me again why we aren't using CVS for the grimoire?,
Michael Taylor, 11/11/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Tell me again why we aren't using CVS for the grimoire?, Ryan Abrams, 11/11/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.