Public SourceMage Discussion List

["Sergey A. Lipnevich" <sergeyli AT pisem.net>]

inetd is part of `netkit-base' spell, so if it makes sense, we could 
separate it into a spell of its own and make it conflict with xinetd. 
Would you like to file a bug about this?

Robin wrote:

> On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 11:20:12PM -0400, Sergey A. Lipnevich wrote:
>  
>
> > Perhaps somebody could also think about the problem of stuff being 
> > started both stand-alone from init.d/ and as xinetd service, like 
> > openssh does?
> >    
> Hmm, this reminds me, why do both inetd and xinetd seem to be required?
> shouldn't we stick with one or t'other (pref xinetd).
> Also, samba starting from xinetd is Bad, I've found. 
>
>