sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Seth Woolley <seth AT tautology.org>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] md5sums
- Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 23:33:54 -0700 (PDT)
For the 1.0 rc, we've been hunting this issue down. it was a
miscommunication on the part of how it was implemented, etc, etc. But
after lots of bug reports, the maintainers now should have a pretty good
idea what spells need to be fixed. :)
I personally went through all the grimoire I could download with summon
-all.
Keep on trucking, though.
Seth (md5sum bug submitter galore)
On Wed, 16 Oct 2002, Jeremy Kolb wrote:
> Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 00:48:37 -0500
> From: Jeremy Kolb <jkolb AT brandeis.edu>
> To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> Subject: [SM-Discuss] md5sums
>
> im not sure why, but lately a lot of spells that are cast through my
> system-update (i haven't explicitly cast anything lately, just use
> system-update) do not have the right md5sums (example is xlockmore). i
> don't know if this is because people don't update the sum or maybe
> something in the devel-sorcery is being cranky, but i've seen this ever
> since the md5 checking was implemented. this is going to be a big
> problem when users go to install their system and half of their programs
> do not cast because of sorcery aborting on an incorrect sum. sorry about
> the rant, midterms stressing me out. thanks for listening.
>
> jeremy
>
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Discuss mailing list
> SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
>
-
[SM-Discuss] md5sums,
Jeremy Kolb, 10/16/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] md5sums, bluebird, 10/16/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] md5sums, Seth Woolley, 10/16/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.