sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
Re: [SM-Discuss] md5 checks / possibly compromised openssh tarball
- From: julian AT openit.de (Julian v. Bock)
- To: sm-discuss <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] md5 checks / possibly compromised openssh tarball
- Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2002 12:45:24 +0200
Hi
Just downloaded a "fresh" openssh tarball, and it is actually
compromised. Our spell contained the correct md5 checksum. Anyone left
who thinks that checksum checks don't give additional security?
Julian
-
[SM-Discuss] md5 checks / possibly compromised openssh tarball,
Julian v. Bock, 08/01/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] md5 checks / possibly compromised openssh tarball,
Julian v. Bock, 08/01/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] md5 checks / possibly compromised openssh tarball,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 08/01/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] md5 checks / possibly compromised openssh tarball, Eric Sandall, 08/01/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] md5 checks / possibly compromised openssh tarball,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 08/01/2002
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [SM-Discuss] md5 checks / possibly compromised openssh tarball, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 08/01/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] md5 checks / possibly compromised openssh tarball,
Julian v. Bock, 08/01/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.