sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Andrew Stitt <afrayedknot AT thefrayedknot.armory.com>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: [SM-Discuss] tmpfs
- Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2002 14:07:10 -0700
i tested out compilations with and without tmpfs on my computer using
the modified subroutines file i sent in earlier. I compiled mozilla,
with time cast -c mozilla and with tmpfs, and ext2. the system had
basically the same user load for both compiles (me checking email and
playing nethack). Heres what i got:
time cast -c mozilla
with tmpfs:
real 52m4.890s
user 48m9.340s
sys 3m9.450s
with ext2:
real 53m50.244s
user 48m9.410s
sys 3m20.190s
notice the almost identical user time, and increased sys time in the
ext2 case....
the machine in question has a p4 1.4 ghz processor, 256mb of physical
ram and a 512 mb swap partition, and of course i had already summoned
mozilla.
Im currently starting up a second test on an AMD 400 with 80 mb of RAM,
512 mb of swap and using ext2 as the primary filesystem.
-
[SM-Discuss] tmpfs,
Andrew Stitt, 07/23/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] tmpfs,
Eric Sandall, 07/24/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] tmpfs,
Phil/CERisE/KG6MBQ, 07/24/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] tmpfs,
Jonathan Evraire, 07/24/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] tmpfs,
Eric Sandall, 07/24/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] tmpfs, Jonathan Evraire, 07/24/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] tmpfs, bluebird, 07/25/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] tmpfs, Andrew Stitt, 07/24/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] tmpfs, Phil/CERisE/KG6MBQ, 07/24/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] tmpfs,
Eric Sandall, 07/24/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] tmpfs,
Aaron Brice, 07/25/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] tmpfs, Thomas Matysik, 07/25/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] tmpfs,
Jonathan Evraire, 07/24/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] tmpfs,
Phil/CERisE/KG6MBQ, 07/24/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] tmpfs,
Eric Sandall, 07/24/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.