Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-commit - Re: [SM-Commit] GIT changes to master grimoire by Arjan Bouter (842ae83bd0b59320cf60eae62559ee4eb76a5772)

sm-commit AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Source Mage code commit list

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Eric Sandall <eric AT sandall.us>
  • To: George Sherwood <pilot AT beernabeer.com>
  • Cc: sm-commit AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Commit] GIT changes to master grimoire by Arjan Bouter (842ae83bd0b59320cf60eae62559ee4eb76a5772)
  • Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2009 10:38:01 -0700

On Tue, 2009-08-04 at 07:49 -0500, George Sherwood wrote:
> On Tue, 04 Aug 2009 14:06:03 +0200
> Arjan Bouter <abouter AT gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Op maandag 03-08-2009 om 19:03 uur [tijdzone -0700], schreef Eric
> > Sandall:
> > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > > Hash: SHA1
> > >
> > > Arjan Bouter wrote:
> > > >
> > > > New commits:
> > > > commit f0b5f14b5dd0e615829995e34ad8ad9f86fbe68e
> > > > Author: Arjan Bouter <abouter AT sourcemage.org>
> > > > Commit: Arjan Bouter <abouter AT sourcemage.org>
> > > >
> > > > openoffice: taking a shot at openoffice 3.1.0 WORK IN PROGRESS
> > >
> > > Please use the already WIP origin/devel-openoffice branch. Thanks
> > > for taking a shot at this. :)
> > >
> > > - -sandalle
> > >
> > > - --
> > > Eric Sandall | Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
> > > eric AT sandall.us PGP: 0xA8EFDD61 | http://www.sourcemage.org/
> > > http://eric.sandall.us/ | http://counter.li.org/ #196285
> > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> >
> >
> > You're welcome :)
> >
> > If I'd known about the wip branch before starting I would have used it
> > right away, sorry about that, but then again...
> > How many of us could still build this spell and are actually using it?
> > versions 2.0beta2 or 1.1.5 (debian stable overtook us version
> > wise...)?
> >
> > According to HISTORY those are from 2005. From what I can tell, that's
> > also the last year this spell has seen any quality time spent with it
> > besides spell api changes :(
> >
> > So imho it doesn't really matter for this spell to be fixed while in
> > test.
> >
>
> I agree with Arjan on this one. I would rather have a broke current
> spell in test for people to easily work on versus a broke over 3 year
> old spell in test that just gets ignored.

That was my point, the spell in devel-openoffice is way more current
than the one in test so would have been easier to start working on. If
it's broken in test it should be fixed or removed, not kept tinkering
with and confusing users about what's available.

-sandalle

--
Eric Sandall | Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
eric AT sandall.us PGP: 0xA8EFDD61 | http://www.sourcemage.org/
http://eric.sandall.us/ | http://counter.li.org/ #196285

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page