Source Mage code commit list

[George Sherwood <pilot AT beernabeer.com>]

On Tue, 04 Aug 2009 14:06:03 +0200
Arjan Bouter <abouter AT gmail.com> wrote:

> Op maandag 03-08-2009 om 19:03 uur [tijdzone -0700], schreef Eric
> Sandall:
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> > 
> > Arjan Bouter wrote:
> > > 
> > > New commits:
> > > commit f0b5f14b5dd0e615829995e34ad8ad9f86fbe68e
> > > Author: Arjan Bouter <abouter AT sourcemage.org>
> > > Commit: Arjan Bouter <abouter AT sourcemage.org>
> > > 
> > >     openoffice: taking a shot at openoffice 3.1.0 WORK IN PROGRESS
> > 
> > Please use the already WIP origin/devel-openoffice branch. Thanks
> > for taking a shot at this. :)
> > 
> > - -sandalle
> > 
> > - --
> > Eric Sandall                     |  Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
> > eric AT sandall.us PGP: 0xA8EFDD61  |  http://www.sourcemage.org/
> > http://eric.sandall.us/          |  http://counter.li.org/  #196285
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 
> 
> You're welcome :)
> 
> If I'd known about the wip branch before starting I would have used it
> right away, sorry about that, but then again...
> How many of us could still build this spell and are actually using it?
> versions 2.0beta2 or 1.1.5 (debian stable overtook us version
> wise...)? 
> 
> According to HISTORY those are from 2005. From what I can tell, that's
> also the last year this spell has seen any quality time spent with it
> besides spell api changes :(
> 
> So imho it doesn't really matter for this spell to be fixed while in
> test.
> 

I agree with Arjan on this one.  I would rather have a broke current
spell in test for people to easily work on versus a broke over 3 year
old spell in test that just gets ignored.

George

-- 
George Sherwood
Source Mage GNU/Linux Lead Developer
http://www.sourcemage.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature