Source Mage code commit list

[Arwed von Merkatz <v.merkatz AT gmx.net>]

On Fri, May 05, 2006 at 07:45:02PM +0200, Ladislav Hagara wrote:
> > Couple problems here:
> > This bug (11018) does not have an integrate to stable flag, is this a
> > security fix? Why is this exempt from normal process?
> >
> > More than just the fix for bug 11018 was integrated (supposed to
> > cherry-pick the minimal changeset) KEYWORDS was not necessary for bug
> > 11018 to be fixed.
> 
> 
> I just have come to my office. I wanted to fix some bugs and make our 
> distro again a little better. Thanks to you I am only angry and no mood 
> to fix spells. Why to do it? To read such an emails.  I really do not 
> understand you.  I fixed a bug in devel and test grimoire. Why do you 
> want  our users of stable grimoire to have broken spell? How long? Until 
> stable 0.4?
> 
> What is a normal process? I thought that stable flag was only for 
> developers without access to stable grimoire. I have this access. Some 
> fellows probably believe me, you probably not. I have been contributing 
> to our distro more than 4 years. My first spells (for example ethereal) 
> have ENTERED=20020116. Do you thing I want to destroy stable grimoire? 
> Moreover I only added DEPENDS file and KEYWORDS.
> 
> Andrew, we both know we have different opinions about new features and 
> about next developing of our distro. However we both want the same, the 
> better distro. So please, do not provoke me.
 
I'm pretty sure it wasn't meant as provocation, just a note about policy
that might not have been clear so far.
Those flags are for everyone, whether they have access to stable or not,
to get another set of eyes looking at changes.
I'm writing a mail to sm-discuss right now to get comments about the
process I'd like to see implemented for such integrations.

-- 
Arwed v. Merkatz                              Source Mage GNU/Linux developer
                                                    http://www.sourcemage.org