sm-admin AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Developer Only Discussion List
List archive
Re: [SM-Admin] Re: [SM-Discuss] license of xfree86
- From: Hamish Greig <hgreig AT bigpond.net.au>
- To: sm-admin AT lists.ibiblio.org, SM-Discuss <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Cc:
- Subject: Re: [SM-Admin] Re: [SM-Discuss] license of xfree86
- Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 18:07:09 +1100
On Sun, 22 Feb 2004 09:52, Andrew wrote:
> > voting needs to be done more efficiently than this. It would be easier to
> > votes as individuals (maybe in a seperate vote-only thread). The current
> > way means if two people forward/reply to the same message at the same
> > time then one persons vote will have to be manually added to the total .
> > If five people all forward /reply to the same message it starts to get
> > very messy.
> >
> > Instead of having to figure out where each new email fits in the chain of
> > voting, each email should only list that one persons vote. Then votes
> > can be added easily and no votes can be lost.
>
> Is there a way to extend the poll feature on the website to work only
> for certain registered users? Perhaps we could get bugzilla's voting
> system to help us and we could make quasi bugs to vote on? Or just post
> responses to the bugs instead. The only problem is people having multiple
> bugzilla accounts, but I think we could deal with that.
I think email is a good media to use. You only need reply to the original
with
your vote at the top. Using bugs and poll booths are good ideas but it might
put people off because it requires more time and actions.
Hamish
Attachment:
pgpG1HOfFJ6TA.pgp
Description: signature
-
Re: [SM-Admin] Re: [SM-Discuss] license of xfree86
, (continued)
-
Re: [SM-Admin] Re: [SM-Discuss] license of xfree86,
Arwed von Merkatz, 02/21/2004
-
Re: [SM-Admin] Re: [SM-Discuss] license of xfree86,
Eric Sandall, 02/21/2004
- Re: [SM-Admin] Re: [SM-Discuss] license of xfree86, Jason Flatt, 02/21/2004
-
Re: [SM-Admin] Re: [SM-Discuss] license of xfree86,
Jason Flatt, 02/21/2004
-
Re: [SM-Admin] Re: [SM-Discuss] license of xfree86,
Jose Bernardo Silva, 02/21/2004
- Re: [SM-Admin] Re: [SM-Discuss] license of xfree86, Robert Helgesson, 02/22/2004
-
Re: [SM-Admin] Re: [SM-Discuss] license of xfree86,
Ladislav Hagara, 02/23/2004
- Re: [SM-Admin] Re: [SM-Discuss] license of xfree86, Unet, 02/23/2004
-
Re: [SM-Admin] Re: [SM-Discuss] license of xfree86,
Jose Bernardo Silva, 02/21/2004
-
Re: [SM-Admin] Re: [SM-Discuss] license of xfree86,
Eric Sandall, 02/21/2004
-
Re: [SM-Admin] Re: [SM-Discuss] license of xfree86,
Hamish Greig, 02/21/2004
-
Re: [SM-Admin] Re: [SM-Discuss] license of xfree86,
Andrew, 02/21/2004
- Re: [SM-Admin] Re: [SM-Discuss] license of xfree86, Hamish Greig, 02/24/2004
-
Re: [SM-Admin] Re: [SM-Discuss] license of xfree86,
Andrew, 02/21/2004
-
Re: [SM-Admin] Re: [SM-Discuss] license of xfree86,
Arwed von Merkatz, 02/21/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.