sm-admin AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Developer Only Discussion List
List archive
Re: [SM-Admin] Re: [SM-Discuss] license of xfree86
- From: Hamish Greig <hgreig AT bigpond.net.au>
- To: sm-admin AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Cc: Eric Schabell <eschabell AT sourcemage.org>, SM-Discuss <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Admin] Re: [SM-Discuss] license of xfree86
- Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2004 00:00:45 +1100
> I agree with Hamish here... let's make sure we have a total vote (but a
> time limit for 1.0 voting would be nice, or the delay is by defaulting
> over the end of the month!).
>
> The vote here below will be continued on sm-admin, for developers only.
> The vote here can continue on discuss to give the developers an idea
> what the users think?
>
> Voting:
> =======
> staying at the current version of xfree86 +1
> moving new versions to z-rejected +1
> finding/testing new alternatives +1
>
> Voted:
> ======
> Eric Schabel
voting needs to be done more efficiently than this. It would be easier to
votes as individuals (maybe in a seperate vote-only thread). The current way
means if two people forward/reply to the same message at the same time then
one persons vote will have to be manually added to the total . If five people
all forward /reply to the same message it starts to get very messy.
Instead of having to figure out where each new email fits in the chain of
voting, each email should only list that one persons vote. Then votes can be
added easily and no votes can be lost.
Hamish
Attachment:
pgpjOYS5vdXP9.pgp
Description: signature
-
[SM-Admin] Re: [SM-Discuss] license of xfree86,
Eric Schabell, 02/21/2004
-
Re: [SM-Admin] Re: [SM-Discuss] license of xfree86,
Arwed von Merkatz, 02/21/2004
-
Re: [SM-Admin] Re: [SM-Discuss] license of xfree86,
Eric Sandall, 02/21/2004
- Re: [SM-Admin] Re: [SM-Discuss] license of xfree86, Jason Flatt, 02/21/2004
-
Re: [SM-Admin] Re: [SM-Discuss] license of xfree86,
Jason Flatt, 02/21/2004
-
Re: [SM-Admin] Re: [SM-Discuss] license of xfree86,
Jose Bernardo Silva, 02/21/2004
- Re: [SM-Admin] Re: [SM-Discuss] license of xfree86, Robert Helgesson, 02/22/2004
-
Re: [SM-Admin] Re: [SM-Discuss] license of xfree86,
Ladislav Hagara, 02/23/2004
- Re: [SM-Admin] Re: [SM-Discuss] license of xfree86, Unet, 02/23/2004
-
Re: [SM-Admin] Re: [SM-Discuss] license of xfree86,
Jose Bernardo Silva, 02/21/2004
-
Re: [SM-Admin] Re: [SM-Discuss] license of xfree86,
Eric Sandall, 02/21/2004
-
Re: [SM-Admin] Re: [SM-Discuss] license of xfree86,
Hamish Greig, 02/21/2004
-
Re: [SM-Admin] Re: [SM-Discuss] license of xfree86,
Andrew, 02/21/2004
- Re: [SM-Admin] Re: [SM-Discuss] license of xfree86, Hamish Greig, 02/24/2004
-
Re: [SM-Admin] Re: [SM-Discuss] license of xfree86,
Andrew, 02/21/2004
-
Re: [SM-Admin] Re: [SM-Discuss] license of xfree86,
Arwed von Merkatz, 02/21/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.