Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-admin - Re: [SM-Admin] Re: [SM-Discuss] license of xfree86

sm-admin AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Developer Only Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Hamish Greig <hgreig AT bigpond.net.au>
  • To: sm-admin AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Cc: Eric Schabell <eschabell AT sourcemage.org>, SM-Discuss <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Admin] Re: [SM-Discuss] license of xfree86
  • Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2004 00:00:45 +1100

> I agree with Hamish here... let's make sure we have a total vote (but a
> time limit for 1.0 voting would be nice, or the delay is by defaulting
> over the end of the month!).
>
> The vote here below will be continued on sm-admin, for developers only.
> The vote here can continue on discuss to give the developers an idea
> what the users think?
>
> Voting:
> =======
> staying at the current version of xfree86 +1
> moving new versions to z-rejected +1
> finding/testing new alternatives +1
>
> Voted:
> ======
> Eric Schabel

voting needs to be done more efficiently than this. It would be easier to
votes as individuals (maybe in a seperate vote-only thread). The current way
means if two people forward/reply to the same message at the same time then
one persons vote will have to be manually added to the total . If five people
all forward /reply to the same message it starts to get very messy.

Instead of having to figure out where each new email fits in the chain of
voting, each email should only list that one persons vote. Then votes can be
added easily and no votes can be lost.

Hamish

Attachment: pgpjOYS5vdXP9.pgp
Description: signature




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page