piw AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Permaculture Information Web
List archive
- From: Richard Morris <webmaster AT pfaf.org>
- To: Permaculture Information Web <piw AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: PIW Relationships Modelling
- Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2005 15:10:01 +0100
Marco Stahl wrote:
Hi all!
Maybe its possible to express Relationships as INPUTS/OUTPUTS of an entity
(plant, animal, human, machine,...).
An Entity could also be a category.
Example:
entity | parent
---------------
creature NULL
animal creature
plant creature
bean plant
hemp plant
entity | OUTPUT
---------------
bean nitrogen
hemp climb help
hemp seed
hemp fibre
entity | INPUTS
---------------
bean climb help
hemp nitrogen
We could also include the amount of the produced or needed product and
reduce OUTPUT and INPUT to INPUT/OUTPUT.
entity | (INPUT)/OUTPUT | amount
-------------------------------------
bean nitrogen 100
bean climbhelp -100 hemp nitrogen -100
hemp climb help 50
hemp seed 50
hemp fibre 50
If Hemp is normaly a average "climb help" but a good one for beans, we could
express that in this way:
entity | (INPUT)/OUTPUT | amount
-------------------------------------
bean nitrogen 100
bean climbhelp -100 hemp nitrogen -100
hemp climb help 50
hemp climb help bean 100
hemp seed 50
hemp fibre 50
or alternativ:
entity | (INPUT)/OUTPUT | amount | targetentity
--------------------------------------------------
bean nitrogen 100 bean climbhelp -100 hemp nitrogen -100
hemp climb help 50
hemp climb help 100 bean
hemp seed 50
hemp fibre 50
Advantage of this approach:
---------------------------
* No need for writing 10000000 relationshipentries just for the fact, that 100 plants produce something that all other
plants need (can even reduced/automated more with help
of categories)
* you can easely integrate other entities than plants
* you can easely express uses as products (and inputs of the entity human)
* you could even express stuff like "a plant needs wet soil, high
temperature"
* maybe: (semi)automatic guild/permaculture-design-generation
I hope you like my ideas,
Yes seems interesting. Were still throwing ideas on relationships back and forward at the moment. The notion of RDF triples seems quite attractive and cound certainly fit with what your describing.
Saludos, Marco
Good to have you along.
Rich
-
PIW Relationships Modelling,
Marco Stahl, 07/14/2005
- Re: PIW Relationships Modelling, Richard Morris, 07/15/2005
-
Re: PIW Relationships Modelling,
Sean Maley, 07/15/2005
-
Re: PIW Relationships Modelling,
Marco Stahl, 07/17/2005
-
Re: PIW Relationships Modelling,
Chad Knepp, 07/17/2005
-
Re: PIW Relationships Modelling,
Marco Stahl, 07/17/2005
- Re: PIW Relationships Modelling, Chad Knepp, 07/17/2005
- Re: PIW Relationships Modelling, Richard Morris, 07/17/2005
-
Re: PIW Relationships Modelling,
Marco Stahl, 07/17/2005
-
Re: PIW Relationships Modelling,
Chad Knepp, 07/17/2005
- Re: PIW [pcplantdb] Relationships Modelling, Chad Knepp, 07/17/2005
-
Re: PIW Relationships Modelling,
Marco Stahl, 07/17/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.