Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

permaculture - [permaculture] New federal rules on stream protection hailed. Environment America, called the rules "the biggest victory for clean water in a decade."

permaculture@lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: permaculture

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Lawrence London <lfljvenaura@gmail.com>
  • To: permaculture <permaculture@lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: [permaculture] New federal rules on stream protection hailed. Environment America, called the rules "the biggest victory for clean water in a decade."
  • Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 20:04:12 -0400

[Be sure to support this anyway you can; forward this post.]

New federal rules on stream protection hailed.
http://bigstory.ap.org/article/a32c338d56f4412ab4fa5db211243a38/epa-rules-protect-drinking-water-regulate-small-streams

FILE - In this Nov. 19, 2014 file photo, EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy
speaks in Washington. The... Read more

WASHINGTON (AP) — New federal rules designed to better protect small
streams, tributaries and wetlands — and the drinking water of 117 million
Americans — are being criticized by Republicans and farm groups as going
too far.

The White House says the rules, issued Wednesday, will provide much-needed
clarity for landowners about which waterways must be protected against
pollution and development. But House Speaker John Boehner declared they
will send "landowners, small businesses, farmers, and manufacturers on the
road to a regulatory and economic hell."

The rules, issued by the Environmental Protection Agency and the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers, aim to clarify which smaller waterways fall under
federal protection after two Supreme Court rulings left the reach of the
Clean Water Act uncertain. EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy said the waters
affected would be only those with a "direct and significant" connection to
larger bodies of water downstream that are already protected.

The Supreme Court decisions in 2001 and 2006 left 60 percent of the
nation's streams and millions of acres of wetlands without clear federal
protection, according to EPA, causing confusion for landowners and
government officials.

The new rules would kick in and force a permitting process only if a
business or landowner took steps to pollute or destroy covered waters.

EPA says the rules will help landowners understand exactly which waters
fall under the Clean Water Act. For example, a tributary must show evidence
of flowing water to be protected — such as a bank or a high water mark.

President Barack Obama said that while providing that clarity for business
and industry, the rules "will ensure polluters who knowingly threaten our
waters can be held accountable."

There is deep opposition from the Republican-led Congress and from farmers
and other landowners concerned that every stream, ditch and puddle on their
private land could now be subject to federal oversight. The House voted to
block the regulations earlier this month, and a Senate panel is planning to
consider a similar bill this summer.

House Speaker Boehner called the rules "a raw and tyrannical power grab."

EPA's McCarthy has acknowledged the proposed regulations last year were
confusing, and she said the final rules were written to be clearer. She
said the regulations don't create any new permitting requirements for
agriculture and even add new exemptions for artificial lakes and ponds and
water-filled depressions from construction, among other features.

These efforts were "to make clear our goal is to stay out of agriculture's
way," McCarthy and Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works Jo-Ellen
Darcy said in a blog on the EPA website.

The American Farm Bureau Federation has led opposition to the rules, saying
they could make business more difficult for farmers. The group said
Wednesday that it would wait to review the final rules before responding.

The agriculture industry has been particularly concerned about the
regulation of drainage ditches on farmland. The EPA and Army Corps said the
only ditches that would be covered under the rule are those that look, act
and function like tributaries and carry pollution downstream.

Another farm group, the National Farmers Union, said it still has some
concerns about the impact on farmers but is pleased with the increased
clarity on ditches, "removing a gray area that has caused farmers and
ranchers an incredible amount of concern."

Since the rules were originally proposed last year, the EPA has been
working to clear up some misconceptions, putting to rest rumors that
puddles in your backyard would be regulated, for example. Farming practices
currently exempted from the Clean Water Act — plowing, seeding and the
movement of livestock, among other things — will continue to be exempted.

Environmentalists praised the rules, saying many of the nation's waters
would regain federal protections that had been in doubt since the Supreme
Court rulings.

Margie Alt, executive director with Environment America, called the rules
"the biggest victory for clean water in a decade."



  • [permaculture] New federal rules on stream protection hailed. Environment America, called the rules "the biggest victory for clean water in a decade.", Lawrence London, 05/27/2015

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page