Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

permaculture - [permaculture] Fwd: [New post] Bolivia creates a new opportunity for climate talks that failed at Copenhagen

permaculture@lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: permaculture

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Permaculture Cooperative <permaculturecoop@gmail.com>
  • To: pil-pc-oceania <pil-pc-oceania@lists.permacultureinternational.org>, permaculture <permaculture@lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: [permaculture] Fwd: [New post] Bolivia creates a new opportunity for climate talks that failed at Copenhagen
  • Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 18:31:33 -0700

Evo is the most impressive democratic leader in the world today and with the
Rights of Mother Earth we will see a new global legal architecture around
the rights of nature

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: World People's Conference on Climate Change and the Rights of Mother
Earth <no-reply@wordpress.com>
Date: Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 2:54 PM
Subject: [New post] Bolivia creates a new opportunity for climate talks that
failed at Copenhagen
To: permaculturecoop@gmail.com


<http://pwccc.wordpress.com/author/boliviaun/> Bolivia creates a new
opportunity for climate talks that failed at
Copenhagen<http://pwccc.wordpress.com/2010/03/19/bolivia-creates-a-new-opportunity-for-climate-talks-that-failed-at-copenhagen/>
*Admin <http://pwccc.wordpress.com/author/boliviaun/>* | March 19, 2010 at
5:54 pm | Categories:
Uncategorized<http://pwccc.wordpress.com/category/uncategorized/>|
URL:
http://wp.me/pNHgJ-fd

*(The Guardian)* Bolivia will host an international meeting on climate
change next month because it is not prepared to 'betray its people'

By Pablo Solón Romero

(The Guardian) In the aftermath of the Copenhagen climate conference, those
who defended the widely condemned outcome tended to talk about it as a "step
in the right direction". This was always a tendentious argument, given that
tackling climate change can not be addressed by half measures. We can't make
compromises with nature.

Bolivia, however, believed that Copenhagen marked a backwards step, undoing
the work built on since the climate talks in Kyoto. That is why, against
strong pressure from industrialised countries, we and other developing
nations refused to sign the Copenhagen accord and why we are hosting an
international meeting on climate change next month. In the words of the
Tuvalu negotiator, we were not prepared to "betray our people for 30 pieces
of silver".

Our position was strongly criticised by several industrialised countries,
who did their brazen best to blame the victims of climate change for their
own unwillingness to act. However, recent communications by the European
Commission have confirmed why we were right to oppose the Copenhagen accord.

In a report called International climate policy post-Copenhagen (pdf), the
commission confirmed that the pledges by developed countries are equal to
between 13.2% and 17.8% in emissions reductions by 2020 – far below the
required 40%-plus reductions needed to keep global temperature rise to less
than 2C degrees.

The situation is even worse once you take into account what are called
"banking of surplus emission budgets" and "accounting rules for land use,
land use change and forestry". The Copenhagen accord would actually allow
for an increase in developed country emissions of 2.6% above 1990 levels.
This is hardly a forward step.

This is not just about gravely inadequate commitments, it is also about
process. Whereas before, under the Kyoto protocol, developed countries were
legally bound to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by a certain percentage,
now countries can submit whatever targets they want without a binding
commitment.

This dangerous approach to climate negotiations is like building a dam where
everyone contributes as many bricks as they want regardless of whether it
stops the river.

The Copenhagen accord opens the dam and condemns millions. Various estimates
suggest that the commitments made under the accord would lead to increases
of between three to four degrees celsius – a level that many scientists
consider disastrous for human life and our ecosystems.

For Bolivia, the disastrous outcome of Copenhagen was further proof that
climate change is not the central issue in negotiations. For rich countries,
the key issues in negotiations were finance, carbon markets, competitiveness
of countries and corporations, business opportunities along with discussions
about the political makeup of the US Senate. There was surprisingly little
focus on effective solutions for reducing carbon emissions.

President Evo Morales of Bolivia observed that the best way to put climate
change solutions at the heart of the talks was to involve the people. In
contrast to much of the official talks, the hundreds of civil society
organisations, communities, scientists and faith leaders present in
Copenhagen clearly prioritised the search for effective, just solutions to
climate change against narrow economic interests.

To advance an agenda based on effective just solutions, Bolivia is therefore
hosting a Peoples' Conference on Climate Change and the Rights of Mother
Earth on 19-22 April, and inviting everyone to participate. Unlike
Copenhagen, there will be no secret discussions behind closed doors.
Moreover the debate and proposals will be led by communities on the
frontlines of climate change and by organisations and individuals dedicated
to tackling the climate crisis. All 192 governments in the UN have also been
invited to attend and encouraged to listen to the voices of civil society
and together develop common proposals.

We hope that this unique format will help shift power back to the people,
which is where it needs to be on this critical issue for all humanity. We
don't expect agreement on everything, but at least we can start to discuss
openly and sincerely in a way that didn't happen in Copenhagen.

• Pablo Solón is Ambassador to the UN for the Plurinational State of
Bolivia. He is a sociologist and economist, was active in Bolivia's social
movements before entering government, and is an expert on issues of trade,
integration, natural resources and water.

Add a comment to this
post<http://pwccc.wordpress.com/2010/03/19/bolivia-creates-a-new-opportunity-for-climate-talks-that-failed-at-copenhagen/#respond>
<http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/pwccc.wordpress.com/943/>
<http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/pwccc.wordpress.com/943/>
<http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/pwccc.wordpress.com/943/>
<http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/pwccc.wordpress.com/943/>
<http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/pwccc.wordpress.com/943/>

[image: WordPress]

WordPress.com <http://wordpress.com> | Thanks for flying with WordPress!
Manage
Subscriptions<http://subscribe.wordpress.com?key=62914fcac31f83db36a3ebf6454378a9&email=permaculturecoop%40gmail.com>|
One-click
Unsubscribe<http://subscribe.wordpress.com?key=62914fcac31f83db36a3ebf6454378a9&email=permaculturecoop%40gmail.com&b=uE%7Egf5Kjt%2CfoRPI44-4i3%3DVHJ1%7E%5DHRf.mn5qy%254dj>|
Publish text, photos, music, and videos by email using our Post
by Email <http://support.wordpress.com/post-by-email/> feature. | Signup
with WordPress.com <http://wordpress.com/signup/?ref=email>



  • [permaculture] Fwd: [New post] Bolivia creates a new opportunity for climate talks that failed at Copenhagen, Permaculture Cooperative, 03/19/2010

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page