Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

permaculture - Re: [permaculture] Looking for pedalpower resources - any bicycle experts in the list?

permaculture@lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: permaculture

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Lawrence F. London, Jr." <lfl@intrex.net>
  • To: permaculture <permaculture@lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [permaculture] Looking for pedalpower resources - any bicycle experts in the list?
  • Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2007 19:11:46 -0500

Paul Cereghino wrote:

Some thoughts based just my time on bicycles:

If the tillage tools are static (being dragged through the soil), than I bet your main issue will be the friction of the tillage tool vs. the traction of your drive tires.

The toolbar will be adjustable sideways, for the angle of approach to the
ground and
for height above the bed. The teeth (tines and/or blades or other
[blunt-ended, case-hardened,
tapered dowel pins, teeth off cotton picker, engine valves]) can be long or
short,
with forward hook or not, round, blade, etc. and can be angled perpendicular
to the ground,
forward or rearward; many variation on tillage depth, tine type and angle of
approach.
I would raise the toolbar for the first pass and till/rake at a shallow depth
and increase that depth with every pass.
Because of this proposed method the machine should be easily propelled along and across the beds. It would take some effort to pull the machine through muddy ground. The beds have narrow furrows between them and are partially filled with loose garden soil. I would not attempt any operation until the soil had dried out pretty well.


This requirest that the weight above your static tool be heavy. Since you'd be operating at low speed you'll also

Good reason to create a riding tillage machine; you have the weight needed
for traction and for keeping
the tiller forced into the ground.

Initially, all I was trying to do was create a seedbed
but after looking at my fields this afternoon and seeing all the rye and
fescue grass growing there
I can see a need to actually use this machine to at least partially, if not
completely, uproot the grass,
which, if left to grow, will dominate much of the garden space.

The thing about this machine is that you can get out in the garden with it to
repetitively
remove weeds and keep the surface of the soil open, loose and aerated, until
time come to plant seed or starts.
This could be an extremely useful device for row croppers as well as raised
bed gardeners, for market production or
homestead use.


have an issue with intertia, in that if you have a heavy machine with

The machine should be constructed with lightweight components. Points of stress and wear can then be made of heavy, strong and wear-resistant materials.

drag due to friction in the soil, it'll take some energy just to get moving forward, your gear ratio for low gears would need to be extreme.

On a bike at low speed with lots of drag, you can get to a point where you need so much torque to just get going, but the second you get going your too geared up to maintain intertia while switching gears. So how about this as a weird idea:

You're going to be moving very slowly along the beds, making multiple passes
most likely.
With each pass you can till deeper and move along faster. This makes
maintanance easier.
After crops are planted this machine could make use of a configuralbe toolbar
accomodating
tillage teeth or tines or blades that cultivate the soil between the crops,
and on the sloping sides of the beds.
This is the direction to take when moving toward a permanent notill raised
farming method.
No fossil-fueled farm equipment wouldbe needed after a certain point. With
the addition of a seed delivery device
this machine could be used to plant crops. Seed could be dropped into loose soil then slightly covered with some other tooling that followed behind.

If you already need to be heavy to get your traction on the drive wheels, what about some design that uses a flywheel for the drive impulse. The pedel crankshaft builds up intertia in the flywheel... once intertia is built up, some kind of clutch is used to engage the flywheel gear it down to provide a high torque/low speed rotation on the traction tires. The weight of the flywheel doubles function to enhance traction. The pedel power and crank shaft gearing is then used only to build up and maintain the flywheel inertia, but is not needed to overcome the initial and variable friction of the business end of the tool... the potential energy of the flywheel smooths the energy requirements while providing the weight for better traction.

This would be the icing on the cake and could make the difference in rough
terrain
or when an operator weighs a lot. What about the gyroscope effect? Wouldn't
you need a two axis flywheel system?
And wouldn't this machine, with or w/o flywheels need to be front wheel
drive, 4-wheel, or just settle for rear
wheel, the easiest and cheapest system?

The alternative approach would be to use forward momentum as your intertia, but I was not imagining this creature would operate at foward high speeds!

Forward momentum would be a negligible factor on flat ground or going up
slopes but could help going downhill, maybe a lot.

Since tire friction isn't an issue at low speed, consider radical tire traction. I have seen partially submerged rice planting rigs that have tires like paddleweels to maintain traction in mud.

Is certain terrain this might be useful as would rubber tracks, less
compaction,
better traction, maybe less work. Traxpediller.



LL
--
Lawrence F. London, Jr.
Venaura Farm
lfl@intrex.net
http://market-farming.com
http://market-farming.com/venaurafarm
http://venaurafarm.blogspot.com/
http://www.ibiblio.org/ecolandtech





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page