permaculture

["Wendy Smyer Yu" <creeksinger@hotmail.com>]

I see it swinging one of two ways - either tighter control (on many levels) 
or way-too-extended complexity (top heavy inefficiency) ending in 
unravelling of the whole thing.  Attachment to a nation, and expecting it's 
unending continuity, runs contrary to historical evidence that none survive 
eternally.  It's a question of which way it'll swing, though, or how long 
each swing of the continuum lasts.

There'll be interesting wrinkles to iron out if it does go through (ie. 
Canada: guilty 'til proven innocent (or so I've been told); or, so much for 
the plan to escape with one's llamas to Canada when it comes down to being 
monitored within an inch of one's livestock-related-life in the U.S.)...

I agree - keep on with the "small" work of planting and all... though this 
society's insistence on large and cumbersome governance is troubling...

WSY
> > The global elite, through the direct operations of President George Bush
> > and his Administration (with previous help from Clinton, et.al.), are
> > creating a new entity that will combine Canada, Mexico and the U.S. into
> > a superstate called the North American Union (NAU). The NAU is roughly
> > patterned after the European Union (EU). There is no political or
> > economic mandate for creating the NAU, and unofficial polls of a
> > cross-section of Americans indicate that they are overwhelmingly against
> > this end-run around national sovereignty. Instead of Euros for currency,
> > we will have Ameros.
> >
> > Is this a really bad idea?

> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> permaculture mailing list
> permaculture@lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/permaculture
>
>
> End of permaculture Digest, Vol 44, Issue 9
> *******************************************