permaculture@lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: permaculture
List archive
- From: Scott Pittman <pci@permaculture-inst.org>
- To: "permaculture" <permaculture@franklin.oit.unc.edu>
- Subject: Re: permaculture digest: August 05, 2000
- Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2000 17:30:33 -0600
This is a favorite point of mine. Who gets to definethis beauty beast? I walk
in beauty, and my designs are always beautiful, and I am continually adding
to and increasing their beauty. But my criteria for beauty include many items
that don't register on the scale in any garden or landscaping magazine I have
ever seen. I have had several very good vegetable growers tell me they pull
dandelions (Taraxacum) because they are ugly! I have never heard anyone
criticize Pc as lacking in the esthetic dimension and yet furnish a
definition of beauty that resonates for me.
A good design surprises you continually with its own spontaneous, autocthonos
beauty. Can you imagine to control it?!
I cannot. My designs are beautiful too, and yet the conversation was about why mainstream landscape designers avoid pc, not about criticizing permaculture among permies, or defining beauty.
arina
-
Re: permaculture digest: August 05, 2000,
rick valley, 08/14/2000
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: permaculture digest: August 05, 2000, Scott Pittman, 08/15/2000
- Re: permaculture digest: August 05, 2000, mangodance, 08/16/2000
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.