permaculture

["Robert Jensen" <robertscroft@hotmail.com>]

Thanks Myk,

You have crystalised a thought that has been forming for sometime and 
particularly amidst the chaos of this rich theory thread.

Perhaps the philosophy of Permaculture needs to be treated more as a 
"social" issue, whereas the science/theory and in practice variations need 
to be treated organically.

Sometimes putting too much into one string muddies the logic.

Or am I just being muddle headed???

Any thoughts???
Best wishes to you all.
Robert Jensen


> From: "Myk Rushton" <permaculture@wave.co.nz>
> Reply-To: "permaculture" <permaculture@franklin.oit.unc.edu>
> To: "permaculture" <permaculture@franklin.oit.unc.edu>
> Subject: Re: all theory thread
> Date: Sat, 1 Jul 2000 19:05:09 +1200
>
> Greetings
>
> David Holmgren Wrote:
>
> > Perhaps inevitably  working on the principles has led me into
> > a further reorganization and clarification of my
> > own understandings.
>
> How do we define what a permaculture principle actually is or does? As
> opposed to, as Toby says, rules of thumb, guidlelines, design tools or
> physical and biological laws.
>
> Myk
> --
>
>
>
>
> ---
> You are currently subscribed to permaculture as: robertscroft@hotmail.com
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to 
> $subst('Email.Unsub')
> To subscribe send email to lyris@franklin.oit.unc.edu
> with message text containing: subscribe permaculture

________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com