permaculture@lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: permaculture
List archive
- From: Dawn Shepard <dawnjs@mail.wsu.edu>
- To: permaculture <permaculture@franklin.oit.unc.edu>
- Subject: Re:Sustainability
- Date: Mon, 29 May 2000 16:43:45 -0700 (PDT)
Thank you Toby. This was a very helpful post.
> Most definitions of sustainability are laughable in that they refer to
> "sustainable growth" or "sustainable in alignment with economic policy" (an
> earlier post linked to some of these). This is because most definitions have
> to be made politically palatable. And in some cases, more excusably, a short
> time frame is all that can be realistically grasped or predicted for (as
> Keynes said, "in the long run we're all dead"). All systems undergo
> unpredictable perturbations; straight-line extrapolations always wind up
> wrong (read the first edition of "Limits to Growth" to see how wrong they
> were).
Now that you mention it I remember hearing something about this. I still
hope we'll develop better tools and imporve our skills at this. Do you
think it's possible? Of course there still seems to be a lot of use
in determining what would happen if the context did not change
unpredictably, no?
Dawn
>
>
> ---
> You are currently subscribed to permaculture as: dawnjs@mail.wsu.edu
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to $subst('Email.Unsub')
> To subscribe send email to lyris@franklin.oit.unc.edu
> with message text containing: subscribe permaculture
>
-
Re:Sustainability,
Dawn Shepard, 05/29/2000
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: Sustainability, eric + michiko, 05/29/2000
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.