permaculture@lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: permaculture
List archive
RE: RE: questions regarding succession and climax states
- From: "April Sampson-Kelly" <askpv@ozemail.com.au>
- To: "permanet@sunsite. unc. edu" <permanet@metalab.unc.edu>, <Unleesh@aol.com>
- Subject: RE: RE: questions regarding succession and climax states
- Date: Thu, 5 Aug 1999 11:22:58 +1000
there's always interaction,
even when we set out to shun nature, there's interaction,
the cementing of the whole area, then cleaning off of the bird droppings,
what we should design for is interaction that turns everday activity into
production.
April
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Unleesh@aol.com [mailto:Unleesh@aol.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, 3 August 1999 12:15
> To: askpv@ozemail.com.au
> Subject: Re: RE: questions regarding succession and climax states
>
>
> "stable, self-sustaining
> food forests."
>
> right, but they indeed may have intentional groves within these forests,
> right? so it's really like wild orchards ...
>
> so they didn't necessarily maintain a totally "natural" climax
> state, there's
> some interaction ...
>
-
questions regarding succession and climax states,
Unleesh, 08/01/1999
- Re: questions regarding succession and climax states, Toby Hemenway, 08/02/1999
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- RE: RE: questions regarding succession and climax states, April Sampson-Kelly, 08/04/1999
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.