percy-l AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Percy-L: Literary, Religious, Scientific, and Philosophical Discussion of Walker Percy
List archive
- From: Charles Lowry <lowry.charles AT gmail.com>
- To: "Percy-L: Literary and Philosophical Discussion" <percy-l AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [percy-l] End of homo loquens?
- Date: Sun, 10 May 2020 11:19:02 -0400
The only reason some of us are still alive (or still in a relationship or still employed or or still able to shop at a particular bakery or pharmacy or hardware store) is that there is a difference between homo loquens and homo cogitans. The best interrogators and the best negotiators have been able to thrive by blurring the line between homo loquens and homo cogitans. How soon before Musk’s development goes from “Let me tell you telepathically what I want you to know” to “No need to say a thing; I have access to your thoughts”? St. Thomas Aquinas relentlessly insisted that in this life all elements of the person were inseparable. When that changes, when significant chunks of human interaction can be carried out without a physical component, what else changes? At my age it is no sure thing that I’ll be here to see any changes in five years, let alone ten, but I think I’ll just keep talking as long as I can. Or did they, long before Elon Musk and St. Thomas, have this same conversation when writing was invented? Chuck Lowry Brooklyn, New York Sent from my iPhone On May 10, 2020, at 10:56 AM, honeyjbc1 . <honeyjbc AT gmail.com> wrote:
|
-
[percy-l] End of homo loquens?,
Marcus Smith, 05/10/2020
-
Re: [percy-l] End of homo loquens?,
honeyjbc1 ., 05/10/2020
-
Re: [percy-l] End of homo loquens?,
Charles Lowry, 05/10/2020
- Re: [percy-l] End of homo loquens?, honeyjbc1 ., 05/10/2020
- Re: [percy-l] End of homo loquens?, hebrunson, 05/10/2020
-
Re: [percy-l] End of homo loquens?,
Charles Lowry, 05/10/2020
- Re: [percy-l] End of homo loquens?, Ken Armstrong, 05/10/2020
-
Re: [percy-l] End of homo loquens?,
honeyjbc1 ., 05/10/2020
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.