percy-l AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Percy-L: Literary, Religious, Scientific, and Philosophical Discussion of Walker Percy
List archive
- From: "Parlin, Steven" <PARLINS AT culver.org>
- To: "'Percy-L: Literary and Philosophical Discussion'" <percy-l AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: [percy-l] gay marriage
- Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 10:53:59 -0500
Just a quick comment on
the public debate regarding "gay marriage"
I wonder what Percy would
make of this, at least from a semantic point of view. 'Marriage' refers to a
specific thing, the union of man and woman, and whether one argues
that such definitions can be stretched and broadened and altered to be more
inclusive, the truth is they can't. For example, no one would really
allow 'flock of fish' or 'swarm of cows' (unless for
effect). Such words refer to specific things. So, leaving the moral
arguments aside, on purely semantic terms, homosexuals can't be
'married' any more than fish can flock or cows can
swarm.
Just an observation.
Steve
|
-
[percy-l] gay marriage,
Parlin, Steven, 08/12/2003
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [percy-l] gay marriage, Sara Carter, 08/12/2003
- Re: [percy-l] gay marriage, LTberrywtr, 08/12/2003
-
RE: [percy-l] gay marriage,
Parlin, Steven, 08/12/2003
-
Re: [percy-l] gay marriage,
James Piat, 08/12/2003
-
Re: [percy-l] gay marriage,
Phil Hammond, 08/12/2003
- Re: [percy-l] gay marriage, James Piat, 08/12/2003
- More semantics (was Re: [percy-l] gay marriage), Mike Frentz, 08/13/2003
-
Re: [percy-l] gay marriage,
Phil Hammond, 08/12/2003
-
Re: [percy-l] gay marriage,
James Piat, 08/12/2003
- RE: [percy-l] gay marriage, Mike Frentz, 08/12/2003
- RE: [percy-l] gay marriage, Parlin, Steven, 08/12/2003
- Re: [percy-l] gay marriage, Joseph Cimino, 08/12/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.