percy-l AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Percy-L: Literary, Religious, Scientific, and Philosophical Discussion of Walker Percy
List archive
- From: "James Piat" <piat1 AT bellsouth.net>
- To: "Percy-L: Literary and Philosophical Discussion" <percy-l AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [percy-l] here we go again
- Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 12:38:59 -0500
Thanks Karey,
Hmmm, syntax and melody --- sequence and
meaning. I've never thought much about that although my violin teacher is
doing his damnednest to get me to understand music as something more than just
mere emoting -- mostly frustration in my case.
I've long held the suspicion that syntax was
mostly an efficient scaffold for encoding our more or less universally shared
conceptions of time and space as the lattice in which events occured
-- so this universal spatial-temporal scaffold of what we say is mostly
encoded syntactically and the rest (the events themselves) semantically.
We could do it all semantically but given the universality of our
spatial-temporal conceptions encoding the subject-predicate template
gramatically seems the most efficient way to go. Of course I know next to
nothing about what the scholars say.
The notion that an ability to easily learn, store,
retrive and (prehaps most importantly) express sequential information is I
suppose critical to communication. But I also wonder to what extent
representation can occur independent of communication. I think the two are
more closely connected that generally supposed. Perhaps inextricably so.
Best wishes,
Jim Piat
|
-
[percy-l] here we go again,
Karey L. Perkins, 02/17/2003
- Re: [percy-l] here we go again, James Piat, 02/17/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.