percy-l AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Percy-L: Literary, Religious, Scientific, and Philosophical Discussion of Walker Percy
List archive
- From: "Karey Perkins" <karey AT charter.net>
- To: "Percy-L: Literary and Philosophical Discussion" <percy-l AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
- Subject: Re: Conscious Will
- Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 16:53:05 -0400
Well, if we could
figure out what he is, perhaps he is something totally new and different and I
could finally narrow down my dissertation topic...(!)
KP
PS: I agree
"language" is integral to his philosophy...this relates to what a colleague of
mine is working on, the idea of "image" (or symbol...something transcendent and
meaningful -- which for Percy language is a key mediator) vs. "icon" (cliché, or
just the idea of a physical sign, the one for one equation that he says
semioticists like to believe in, but that language really is not). I'm
reading "Naming and Being" right now, in which he says that language
relates to our "ontology."
-----Original Message-----
From: James Piat [mailto:piat1 AT bellsouth.net] Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 8:01 AM To: Percy-L: Literary and Philosophical Discussion Subject: [percy-l] Re: Conscious Will Karey Perkins
wrote:
But, what I didn't pick up until I started on his
non-fiction (which is slower going than the fiction, I'm still on "Signposts in
a Strange Land" and haven't made it to the others yet), is that he is also NOT a
dualist! Of course it's obvious after the fact (Love in the Ruins and Tom
More's lapsometer measuring the physical/spiritual split; the "San Andreas
fault"...). This also relates to our
immanence/transcendence discussion -- what Percy's saying is he's not a
dualist.
So what is
he?
---------
Dear Karey,
Enjoyed your post! I don't know what Percy is or
considered himself philosophically. A Christian of course --perhaps
a Christian existentialist of the Peircean pragmaticist variety. I think
he may have seen language as in some way mediating the dualism of mind and
body. Thanks for the fun and illuminating
comments.
Jim Piat
I wonder about the relationship between religion and
philosophy. They both address some of the same questions. Is it
mostly a matter of faith vs. reason? Faith were reason
fails? --An archive of all list discussion is available at <http://www.ibiblio.org/wpercy/hypermail>. Visit the Walker Percy Project at <http://www.ibiblio.org/wpercy>. |
-
Re: Uncanny Parallels between The Moviegoer and Up in the Air
, (continued)
-
Re: Uncanny Parallels between The Moviegoer and Up in the Air,
Nikkibar, 04/21/2002
-
Re: Uncanny Parallels between The Moviegoer and Up in the Air,
Ken Armstrong, 04/21/2002
-
Re: Uncanny Parallels between The Moviegoer and Up in the Air,
Henry P. Mills, 04/22/2002
-
Conscious Will,
Ken Armstrong, 04/26/2002
-
Re: Conscious Will,
Brian Neuschwander, 04/26/2002
-
Re: Conscious Will,
Ken Armstrong, 04/26/2002
- Re: Conscious Will, tbassett, 04/26/2002
-
Re: Conscious Will,
Ken Armstrong, 04/26/2002
-
Re: Conscious Will,
James Piat, 04/26/2002
-
Re: Conscious Will,
Karey Perkins, 04/26/2002
- Re: Conscious Will, James Piat, 04/26/2002
- Re: Conscious Will, Karey Perkins, 04/26/2002
-
Re: Conscious Will,
Karey Perkins, 04/26/2002
-
Re: Conscious Will,
Ken Armstrong, 04/29/2002
- Re: Conscious Will, James Piat, 04/29/2002
- Re: Conscious Will, Ken Armstrong, 04/30/2002
- Re: Conscious Will, James Piat, 04/30/2002
-
Re: Conscious Will,
Brian Neuschwander, 04/26/2002
-
Conscious Will,
Ken Armstrong, 04/26/2002
-
Re: Uncanny Parallels between The Moviegoer and Up in the Air,
Henry P. Mills, 04/22/2002
-
Re: Uncanny Parallels between The Moviegoer and Up in the Air,
Ken Armstrong, 04/21/2002
-
Re: Uncanny Parallels between The Moviegoer and Up in the Air,
Nikkibar, 04/21/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.