pcplantdb

["Lawrence F. London, Jr." <lfl@intrex.net>]

Lawrence F. London, Jr. wrote:

> > -Chad asked an interesting question, "Ok, thinking more about relationships
> > and I've come to an interesting sticky place in my thinking. My question is,
> > are we talking about an object that has a relationship to one or more objects
> > or a set of objects that have a relationship with each other or is it

With every lifform's entry in the database there is its "mirror" image,
its cultural requirements/habitat/ecological niche/environmental data.
It just seems reasonable to include all this "mirror" data (in depth and 
always expandable) as objects to be included when doing relationships 
matching.
Ex.:  Object x     silt loam soil well-drained,  pH 6.0-6.5, high 
organic matter, constant medium moisture