pcplantdb

[Richard Archer <pcplantdb@juggernaut.com.au>]

At 10:41 AM +0000 26/3/05, Richard Morris wrote:

>The simplest form is
>
>object  | links_to
>-------------------
>plant A | Plant A Guild
>plant A | Plant B Guild
>plant B | Plant B Guild

Backing up a bit... do we really have to manually define every 
possible guild PIW is to represent??

Given the scale of the namespace, I would think that borders on 
the impossible.

I thought the idea was to develop a system that allowed people 
to explore possible guilds. i.e. pull up several plants/objects 
and compare their needs/benefits to see if they would be compatible.

But I might be completely off track here because there's no 
analysis/design document where I can look the aims of the project.
*slap*

A few explicit guilds might be a "nice to have" feature but surely 
that's not the key goal here?

 ...R.