pcplantdb@lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: pcplantdb
List archive
Re: [piw] Re: [pcplantdb] relationships implementation
- From: Richard Archer <pcplantdb@juggernaut.com.au>
- To: Permaculture Plant Database <pcplantdb@lists.ibiblio.org>, Permaculture Information Web <piw@lists.ibiblio.org>
- Cc: PCPLANTDB <pcplantdb@lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [piw] Re: [pcplantdb] relationships implementation
- Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2005 05:46:58 +1100
At 10:41 AM +0000 26/3/05, Richard Morris wrote:
>The simplest form is
>
>object | links_to
>-------------------
>plant A | Plant A Guild
>plant A | Plant B Guild
>plant B | Plant B Guild
Backing up a bit... do we really have to manually define every
possible guild PIW is to represent??
Given the scale of the namespace, I would think that borders on
the impossible.
I thought the idea was to develop a system that allowed people
to explore possible guilds. i.e. pull up several plants/objects
and compare their needs/benefits to see if they would be compatible.
But I might be completely off track here because there's no
analysis/design document where I can look the aims of the project.
*slap*
A few explicit guilds might be a "nice to have" feature but surely
that's not the key goal here?
...R.
-
[pcplantdb] relationships implementation,
Chad Knepp, 03/22/2005
-
Re: [pcplantdb] relationships implementation,
Richard Morris, 03/22/2005
-
Re: [pcplantdb] relationships implementation,
John Schinnerer, 03/22/2005
- Re: [pcplantdb] relationships implementation, Bear Kaufmann, 03/22/2005
- Re: [pcplantdb] relationships implementation, Bear Kaufmann, 03/22/2005
-
Re: [pcplantdb] relationships implementation,
Chad Knepp, 03/25/2005
- Re: [pcplantdb] relationships implementation, John Schinnerer, 03/26/2005
-
Re: [piw] Re: [pcplantdb] relationships implementation,
Richard Morris, 03/26/2005
-
Re: [piw] Re: [pcplantdb] relationships implementation,
Richard Archer, 03/26/2005
-
Re: [piw] Re: [pcplantdb] relationships implementation,
John Schinnerer, 03/26/2005
- Re: [piw] Re: [pcplantdb] relationships implementation, Chad Knepp, 03/26/2005
- Re: [piw] Re: [pcplantdb] relationships implementation, Richard Morris, 03/28/2005
-
Re: [piw] Re: [pcplantdb] relationships implementation,
John Schinnerer, 03/26/2005
-
Re: [piw] Re: [pcplantdb] relationships implementation,
Richard Archer, 03/26/2005
- Re: [pcplantdb] relationships implementation, Bear Kaufmann, 03/27/2005
-
Re: [pcplantdb] relationships implementation,
John Schinnerer, 03/22/2005
-
Re: [pcplantdb] relationships implementation,
Richard Morris, 03/22/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.